Possible Home for Nuke Waste: Salt Beds
Officials want to expand New Mexico facility
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 10, 2014 10:08 AM CST
This March 26, 1999 file photo shows the first load of radioactive waste arriving at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, NM, from the Los Alamos National Labs.   (AP Photo/Thomas Herbert, File)

(Newser) – The Department of Energy already buries some nuclear waste in salt beds, and some officials think the plan should be expanded so more radioactive waste can also be deposited there. At the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant in the desert of Carlsbad, New Mexico, the waste is deposited half a mile below ground in rooms as long as football fields carved out of the salt beds. The salt then acts as a natural sealant, the New York Times reports: Tiny amounts of water inside the salt slowly move toward the heat radiating from the waste, closing in on it at a rate of six inches a year. Experts say the waste will remain sealed for millions of years.

"It's eternity," says one Energy Department tour guide. And "the salt is completely unaffected by any nuclear waste you could imagine, period," says a geologist. Officials think the WIPP site could act as a replacement for the stalled Yucca Mountain repository, which was meant to store waste from spent nuclear fuel. That waste is more radioactive than the plutonium waste currently allowed at WIPP, but experts say with more testing and analysis, the more radioactive waste could potentially also be deposited at WIPP. Many local leaders are eager to expand WIPP, but some state officials oppose the plan, which would need to be approved by Congress before it could move forward.

View 3 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Possible Home for Nuke Waste: Salt Beds is...
1%
37%
2%
30%
26%
5%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 20 comments
Ezekiel 25:17
Feb 18, 2014 8:43 PM CST
Yucca Mountain is a huge boondoggle. They still operate a full staff in northwest Las Vegas to the tune of millions a year in costs and it will never hold single drum of waste. As the results of mostly Obama's actions, the US has NO nuclear waste site and all waste must sit on location of the reactor that created it. With Fukijima we found out that this practice is very safe indeed and you should build one in your home town today.
joepapierzjr
Feb 10, 2014 6:04 PM CST
I hope some laboratories are studying the possibility of deactivating radioactive materials returning them back to a harmless substances. In the meantime any storage decision needs to be mindful of damage to the containers by corrosion, rust, and earthquake. They should never be stored above any underground water source. If our rockets were more reliable I would recommend waste be sent to the sun.
Arthur Machado
Feb 10, 2014 4:03 PM CST
Morons - radioactive material has a very low specific gravity - find the lowest place in the United States and put it there, it will slowly sink to the center of the Earth. Only the Government would try to put radioactive material at the top of the water table in Oregon. And we pay these geniuses for this.