Mammograms Don't Reduce Cancer Deaths
Researchers warn of 'overdiagnosis'
By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 12, 2014 5:04 AM CST
Dr. Karen Lindsfor, a professor of radiology and chief of breast imaging at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, examines the mammogram of a patient.   (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

(Newser) – A wide-ranging, long-term study has cast doubt on the value of annual breast X-rays—and sparked fierce debate in the medical world. The study of 90,000 Canadian women over 25 years suggests annual mammograms could be useless or possibly worse than useless: the death rate from breast cancer and from all causes was the same among women aged 40 to 59 who had annual mammograms and those who had only a physical exam, the CBC reports. More than a fifth of cancers found by mammograms were not a threat to the woman's health, but the "overdiagnosis" caused them to have unnecessary treatments like chemotherapy, the study says.

The researchers say policymakers should reconsider the need for mammograms, arguing that new treatments and better awareness of breast cancer make it less vital to catch cancers so early, the New York Times reports. But some experts and groups not involved in the study disagree strongly with its conclusions and argue that one study—no matter how extensive—shouldn't be cause to change public health policy, the Los Angeles Times finds. The American College of Radiology called the study "deeply flawed" and "incredibly misleading," arguing that it involved "second-hand" mammography equipment and poorly trained technicians.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Mammograms Don't Reduce Cancer Deaths is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 45 comments
Feb 12, 2014 8:44 PM CST
But they do make hospitals lots of money so they are here to stay.
Feb 12, 2014 5:47 PM CST
Don't believe what one article tells you. The govt. wouldn't be covering those exams if they were useless. The rule is to get a checkup every 2 yrs.
Feb 12, 2014 3:43 PM CST
Could it be that corporate health wants us to get expensive tests so they can tell us they are saving our lives? I think our ability to detect far out stripes our ability to understand what the results are telling us. We create problems when none exists.