Stradivarius No Match for New Violins, Test Finds
Soloists assess renowned instruments with surprising results
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Apr 8, 2014 11:08 AM CDT
In this Thursday, March, 27, 2014 photo, Margaret Batjer, concertmaster of the Los Angeles Chamber Orchestra, plays the the 1716 "Milstein” Stradivarius at the Colburn School in Los Angeles.   (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)

(Newser) – Musicians have long been captivated by the instruments of the Stradivari family; centuries after they were built, they've become the stuff of legend. Yet new blind tests seem to shatter the notion that a Stradivarius is actually superior to today's violins. In fact, the tests found expert violinists prefer the new models, and couldn't even distinguish which were new and which were old, LiveScience reports. "Like most people in the violin world, I grew up absolutely believing there was a difference between an old sound and a new sound, and most violinists could readily distinguish it," says violin maker and researcher Joseph Curtin. That is, "until I ... was really forced to listen with my ears, rather than my preconceptions."

His team had 10 famous soloists don sight-obliterating welder's glasses and play six old and six new violins in two environments: a practice studio and a concert hall. The worn edges and antique style of the new ones obscured their youth. The violinists (who, for music buffs, included Olivier Charlier, Pierre Fouchenneret, Susanne Hou, Ilya Kaler, and Giora Schmidt, the Telegraph notes.) rated the instruments in a number of categories, including tone, playability, and volume. The best-performing instrument, according to the soloists as a group, was a new one—it was the favorite of four testers and the second-favorite of four others. The runner-up was a new violin, too, while the third-place finisher was a Stradivarius; the makers of the new ones weren't revealed. As for whether the violinists could discern between new and old, LiveScience notes they were "no more accurate than the flip of a coin." Think you could do better? Take a listening test here.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Stradivarius No Match for New Violins, Test Finds is...
7%
31%
4%
52%
1%
5%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 29 comments
Norman Johnson
Jun 7, 2014 9:07 AM CDT
Objectively speaking, why couldn't a ,say, Barcus Berry fiddle sound as good as a Strad? And if you ask me, violins don't really sound that great anyway.
Norman Johnson
Jun 7, 2014 9:05 AM CDT
Well that's all just dandy.I'm sure Strad did the best he could with what was available to him at the time,back in the 1700's.I'm sure he hadn't planned on his violins being worth millions of dollars, which didn't even exist as a currency at the time he was making them.The antique buyers have set the bar so high as to the monetary value of the instruments.
No-Left-Turn
Jun 7, 2014 8:50 AM CDT
Same kind of deal with wines and other alcohols. Test after test after test have shown that people often cannot tell the difference between their perceived favorite and something much cheaper. I buy the cheapest wines and alcohols that taste good.