The Case for Not Sharing a Bed
Holly Allen thinks she'd be happier in her own twin
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Apr 17, 2014 12:09 PM CDT
Stock image   (Shutterstock)

(Newser) – Holly Allen would beg to differ with the idea that the happiest couples sleep less than an inch apart. She recently found herself going to bed in her own guest room when her husband was sick, and despite the fact that the room only has a twin bed, she had an incredible night's sleep, she writes on Slate. "No tug of war over the covers, no pokes in the back to alert me to my snoring, no waking up to a wiggly kid (or two) in bed with us. In fact, no waking up at all." An informal survey of her co-workers found many of them agree with her—so why do couples typically share a bed?

Initially, we did so for "warmth and security," but that was a long time ago, before blankets and alarm systems. Nowadays, "society" is to blame for the fact that most of us feel compelled to sleep together even though we're probably not getting very good, you know, sleep. "Mention separate beds today and most people assume marital troubles," Allen writes. But chronic bad sleep has been linked to serious health problems, both physical and mental. "Why must we risk these things just to prove to ourselves that we are happy couples? Separate beds means better sleep, which in turn can produce healthier spouses and a happier marriage. I rest my case." Click for Allen's full column.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
The Case for Not Sharing a Bed is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 18 comments
Apr 18, 2014 3:39 AM CDT
I sleep alone and still don't get much sleep. What is wrong with this picture?
Apr 18, 2014 1:45 AM CDT
A king sized bed does not solve the problems, since the wife still ends up with 99% of it. And the snoring is still right there.
Apr 17, 2014 8:16 PM CDT
Compare photos: :-)