John Paul II's Impending Sainthood Is Wrong
Maureen Dowd: He led the church during its pedophilia scandal
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Apr 23, 2014 11:43 AM CDT
Pope John Paul II waves to the faithful in 2001.   (AP Photo/Plinio Lepri, File)

(Newser) – John Paul II accomplished great things as pope, but the Vatican is making a mistake in canonizing him as a saint this weekend, writes Maureen Dowd in the New York Times. The reason is simple and obvious: He "presided over the Catholic Church during nearly three decades of a gruesome pedophilia scandal and grotesque cover-up." So, yes, give the man credit for helping bring about the downfall of Communism and for admonishing the US about its "frenzy of consumerism." But the priests' sex scandal should be a deal-breaker.

"Sometimes leaders can be remarkable in certain ways and then make a mistake so spectacular, it overshadows other historical achievements," writes Dowd. Think Lyndon Johnson, whose efforts on civil rights are diminished by the Vietnam War. The same applies to John Paul II. It's great that he tried to make communist and capitalist societies repent, "but his tragedy is that he never corrected the failings of his own society, over which he ruled absolutely," she writes. "He ain't no saint." Click for her full column.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
John Paul II's Impending Sainthood Is Wrong is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 64 comments
Apr 25, 2014 3:25 PM CDT
As the Vatican press-release said: "Pope John Paul is being canonized because of his own personal holiness, NOT because of anything he did (or did not do) while he was Pope."
Apr 25, 2014 6:38 AM CDT
He also ignored the theft of millions of dollars from the church and the poor, the raping of children and pushed to keep celibacy. In the catholic cult you get rewarded for all your good deeds.
Apr 24, 2014 8:09 AM CDT
I don't think you understand why and how people are chosen for possible canonization....there is a very specific process that you are obviously ignoring.