GOP Rips Bergdahl Deal: 'We Have Now Set a Price'
Susan Rice again sent to face fallout for White House
By Polly Davis Doig, Newser Staff
Posted Jun 1, 2014 12:10 PM CDT
National Security Adviser Susan Rice in the Oval Office in Washington, Monday, May 12, 2014.   (AP Photo)

(Newser) – Republicans are weighing in on the US-Taliban trade that yesterday set POW Bowe Bergdahl free, and they are decidedly not in favor. A sample of reactions on today's talk shows, as per Politico:

  • Mike Rogers: "The No. 1 way that al-Qaeda raises money is by ransom—kidnapping and ransom. We have now set a price. If you negotiate here, you’ve sent a message to every al-Qaeda group in the world that there is some value now in that hostage in a way that they didn’t have before."
  • Ted Cruz: "I do not think the way to deal with terrorists is through releasing other violent terrorists. It's not the only way. We can go in and use military force, as needed, to rescue our fallen compatriots." And further, "The idea that we're now making trades ... says the reason why the US has had the policy for decades of not negotiating with terrorists is because once you start doing it, every other terrorist has an incentive to capture more soldiers."
  • John McCain: "It is disturbing that these individuals would have the ability to re-enter the fight, and they are big, high-level people, possibly responsibly for the deaths of thousands." He said that while "we're all grateful" for Bergdahl's release, the five detainees are the "hardest of the hardcore."
  • Rep. Adam Kinzinger: The Illinois Republican, who is an Iraq and Afghanistan veteran, says, "the release of five mid- to high-level Taliban is shocking to me, especially not coming to Congress. And then putting five people potentially back on the battlefield. There are a lot of questions that need to be asked here."

Meanwhile, Chuck Hagel continued his full-throated defense of the deal and the administration again sent Susan Rice in. Highlights from their appearances this morning:

  • Hagel: "I’ll stand by that decision. I signed off on that decision. The president made the ultimate decision. This is a guy who probably went through hell the last five years. Let’s focus on getting him well and getting him back with his family."
  • And further: "We hope it will present an opening" for further talks with the Taliban, who broke off negotiations in 2012. "We’ve had no relationship since then, so maybe this will be a new opening that can produce an agreement."
  • And Rice, per CNN: "What we did was ensure that, as always, the United States doesn't leave a man or a woman on the battlefield. Because it was the Taliban that had him did not mean that we had any less of an obligation to bring him back." She called obtaining Bergdahl's freedom a "sacred obligation."
  • And even Claire McCaskill: "This was not a hostage; this was a prisoner of war. It is much different when you are negotiating with the enemy for a prisoner of war. We have done prisoner swaps many times in our nation’s history. Unfortunately, this is our enemy now. We don’t have nation-states as our enemies, we have terrorist organizations as our enemies."

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
GOP Rips Bergdahl Deal: 'We Have Now Set a Price' is...
1%
3%
7%
35%
5%
49%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 198 comments
sandrae
Jun 12, 2014 2:17 PM CDT
I worry about Bergdahl. He wound up serving as a result of some bureaucratic mix-up -- and he was not well as attested to by a friend. No one knows what he went through for 5 some years. Is it possible to program someone like him in captivity and turn him into a sleeper cell? I would keep him under observation for a long time. And no, it is not a good idea to start hostage exchanges. John McCain: "It is disturbing that these individuals would have the ability to re-enter the fight, and they are big, high-level people, possibly responsibly for the deaths of thousands." He said that while "we're all grateful" for Bergdahl's release, the five detainees are the "hardest of the hardcore." [Maybe not anymore. We do some things that are hard to understand, but we are not entire idiots.]
Veritas
Jun 3, 2014 9:50 AM CDT
The Obama admin needs to send out drones to kill the five terrorists they set free before it comes back to bite us in the you know what.
MrT
Jun 3, 2014 7:00 AM CDT
Did anyone who's using the word deserter actually read about what happened? They can't have. There was desertion but it came when fellow soldiers and this soldier's commander observed his disturbing behavior and direct question about walking out into the night and did ZERO! They ignored a fellow soldier in trouble. Where's the "band of brothers" in that? Why isn't the commander who ignored his obvious signs of distress disciplined or discharged? He is incompetent to lead men if he is that detached and unable to act in defense of a soldier he then loses unnecessarily. You are all blaming the victim - a wounded soldier who was ignored abandoned by his own comrades. Grow up. Get info before you pass judgment, as if you know something. You are so 4th grade, repeating what you hear like a parrot when a soldier's life is in the balance.