New Focus in Russia Inquiry: Green Party's Jill Stein
She attended 'infamous dinner' in Russia sponsored by RT television network
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Dec 19, 2017 1:27 PM CST
In this 2016 file photo, Jill Stein, the presidential Green Party candidate, speaks at a news conference in front of Trump Tower in New York.   (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)

(Newser) – The Senate intelligence committee has asked for documents from former presidential candidate Jill Stein as part of its probe into Russian interference in the 2016 election, adding another new thread to the panel's investigation as it heads into 2018. Stein said in a statement overnight Tuesday that she was cooperating with the probe and is providing documents to the committee. She has captured the interest of investigators partly because she attended a 2015 dinner sponsored by Russian television network RT with Russian President Vladimir Putin, per the AP. Senate intelligence committee chairman Richard Burr appeared to confirm the investigation's new focus on Stein Monday evening. Asked what the committee wanted to know about from Stein's campaign, Burr responded: "collusion with the Russians."

The request to Stein is more evidence that the Senate panel will still have much work to do in 2018. While the investigation has largely focused on both the Russian interference and whether it was in any way connected to President Trump's campaign, investigators are following multiple leads. The top Democrat on the panel, Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, would not confirm the investigation into Stein but noted on Tuesday that she was at what he called the "infamous dinner" with Putin. Michael Flynn, who later became Trump's national security adviser, also attended the 2015 dinner in Moscow. As the Senate investigation continues, the House intelligence committee is working to wrap up its own probe into the meddling early next year. Investigators are interviewing multiple people this week in hopes that they will finish most of that work before the end of the year.


My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |  
17%
43%
2%
15%
1%
21%