Obama Cover Misses Point of Satire
It supported a lunatic idea, without slamming an established one
By Dustin Lushing,  Newser Staff
Posted Jul 20, 2008 6:28 PM CDT
This illustration provided by The New Yorker magazine, the cover of the July 21, 2008 issue by artist Barry Blitt, shows Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama.   (AP Photo/New Yorker)
camera-icon View 2 more images

(Newser) – The now-infamous New Yorker cover depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as Muslim extremists rankled readers because it is not satire, Lee Siegel argues in the New York Times. Satire tackles "social rottenness once it has become a visible and established part of life," writes Siegel. But the New Yorker gave mainstream credence to a notion of the lunatic fringe.

"The New Yorker represented the right-wing caricature of the Obamas while making the fatal error of not also caricaturing the right wing," Siegel writes. It's as if "a cartoon without commentary" appeared "in a liberal Northern newspaper in the 1920s—a time when Southern violence against blacks was unabated—that showed a black man raping a white woman while eating a watermelon."