Sensitive Swiss Ban Plant Humiliation
Genetic research must not violate the dignity of wheat
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Oct 10, 2008 5:37 PM CDT
"Unfortunately, we have to take it seriously," a Zurich researcher says of the rule.   (Shutterstock)

(Newser) – Swiss scientists eager to carry out genetic experiments on plants can’t be rash—they must first consider the how their actions make that tulip feel. Government-backed ethicists studied the effects of such experimentation on plants’ dignity; they found that it was wrong to hurt plants for no reason, or to genetically render them sterile, the Wall Street Journal reports. The finding sparked new rules, based on a constitutional amendment.

The 1990s amendment was made to protect all living things from indignities borne of genetic tweaking. Now, when a scientist wants to conduct field trials on plants, he or she must first make the case that the procedures won’t be harmful. “It's one more constraint on doing genetic research,” says a Swiss scientist. But “where does it stop?” wondered a colleague. “Should we now defend the dignity of microbes and viruses?"

View 2 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 1 of 1 comment
Solomon
Feb 11, 2011 3:37 PM CST
The Swiss are quite pragmatic. the migration of GMO from crops to contaminate local frogs and insects was alarming. I urge strict quarantine of GMO production facilities and mandatory labeling of GMO foods until such time as the technology has been perfected. That process has been too slow to start and what little has been studied has not sounded particularly promising. www.seedsofdeception.com "44,000 internal FDA documents made public by a lawsuit show ... the overwhelming consensus among the FDA’s own scientists was that GM foods were quite different (from non-GM natural foods) and could lead to unpredictable and hard-to-detect allergens, toxins, new diseases and nutritional problems. It turns out that FDA scientists, who had urged superiors to require long-term studies, were ignored. See, Failed Government Regulation."