Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Team of Rivals Starting to Crack

Separate visits to State Dept by Rice, Clinton suggest competition

By Gabriel Winant,  Newser User

Posted Dec 9, 2008 8:13 AM CST

(Newser) – Separate visits to the State Department by Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice yesterday suggest that the rift between Barack Obama’s two highest-level diplomats may not have healed, reports the AP. Rice, the incoming UN ambassador, bucked her former Clinton administration bosses to support Obama in the primaries. Now she’ll technically be a Clinton subordinate, though Obama may elevate her position to Cabinet-level status.

To maximize her foreign policy pull, Rice is pushing for her own transition team within the State Department, as well as at her primary New York office, anonymous sources say. Influential UN ambassadors have had conflicts with their secretaries of state before: Rice mentor Secretary Madeleine Albright had an icy relationship with Clinton UN ambassador Dick Holbrooke.

In this file photo of Dec. 18, 2007, Barack Obama takes a question from the audience at a foreign policy forum in Des Moines, Iowa, joined at left by former Assistant Secretary of State Susan Rice.
In this file photo of Dec. 18, 2007, Barack Obama takes a question from the audience at a foreign policy forum in Des Moines, Iowa, joined at left by former Assistant Secretary of State Susan Rice.   (AP Photo/Kevin Sanders, File)
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice smiles during a press conference with  Britain's Foreign Secretary David Miliband after their meeting in London, Monday, Dec. 1, 2008.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice smiles during a press conference with Britain's Foreign Secretary David Miliband after their meeting in London, Monday, Dec. 1, 2008.   (AP Photo/Akira Suemori)
Barack Obama, far left, smiles at National Security Adviser-designate James Jones, far right, as Hillary Rodham Clinton, left center, and Susan Rice, right center, look on, Dec. 1, 2008.
Barack Obama, far left, smiles at National Security Adviser-designate James Jones, far right, as Hillary Rodham Clinton, left center, and Susan Rice, right center, look on, Dec. 1, 2008.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 13 comments
Shannonals
Dec 9, 2008 9:29 PM CST
Corona_king, since you have such sage advice to give how about you run for an office? Those that can do, those that can't sit back and whine and complain about others
Guest
Dec 9, 2008 3:43 AM CST
There is plenty of blame for both parties, but the Fannie/Freddie thing is wrong. First of all, McCain had people in his campaign still drawing money from this organization up until one month before the election, and the changes you speak of happened in a Republican dominated Congress. Also, don't you recall George Bush bragging about the increase in home ownership a year or so ago, about the only fiscal thing he had to brag about. Fannie/Freddie also regulated their loans much more austerily than most private banks. They were all turning money as fast as they could for commission today-damn the consequences tomorrow. Besides, the mortgage crisis could have been absorbed, though it would have hurt. The true damage is being done by the derivatives/credit default swap crisis. There may have been $40 bet like in a casino for every bad dollar in the mortgage crisis in this totally unregulated shadow industry. As for the revisionist history about FDR, you share that view with about two economic historians and 8 million Rush/Hannity/Colter listeners from a single book. There is much more historical evidence to indicate that FDR did indeed both avert a revolution and save many of the common people in this country from total destitution, and that his policies brought the economy back much quicker that if we had remained on the Hoover course.
wwwonderer
Dec 9, 2008 1:51 AM CST
Blame WHAT on Bush? What do you mean by "THIS', Feragola? That people disagree with his picks? So he has upset some on the left AND the right with some appointments. So what. He will probably make many more upset once he starts to develop policies. I remember during the campaign, it was often asked how has Obama defied in his OWN party, much as McCain did as the 'maverick' of the GOP. So now when he DOESN'T cater to the complete left, now he is unfit. See, the GOP is the party of uncontested support and lock step. If EVERYONE doesn't think THE SAME, they are traitors and unpatriotic. I welcome people who welcome contrasting views. Contrasting, as well as supporting views should be used to show the way to truth, not delusion.

More Newser Stories

Clinton the Campaigner Moves to State—for Good or Ill

'Hillary Effect' Credited for Rise of Female Diplomats

Mitchell, Holbrooke Named Special Envoys

Clinton: UN Must Send 'Clear Message' to Syria

Hillary Clinton Starts Historic Burma Visit


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne