Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


7

Judge: Cheney Won't Dump Records

Accepts aide's word that docs will go safely to Archives

Share

(Newser) – A federal judge yesterday rejected historians’ and nonprofits’ complaint that Vice President Dick Cheney planned to illegally dump some of his papers, the Washington Post reports. The judge instead took the word of a White House aide that the documents would go to the National Archives as required. The ruling follows a long tussle over Cheney’s power to decide what to reveal; throughout, Cheney has lost on almost every issue.

But “at the end of the day, we couldn't come up with evidence” that records would be hidden or destroyed, said a plaintiff’s council. The judge noted “constantly shifting arguments” on Cheney’s side, but said that “that confusion is not evidence” to prompt a rejection of the aide’s testimony. But at least one plaintiff, an academic, is still concerned that “when the Archives goes to open Cheney's papers, they are going to find empty boxes.”

Vice President Dick Cheney pauses during an interview with the Associated Press at the White House, Thursday, Jan. 8, 2009 in Washington.
Vice President Dick Cheney pauses during an interview with the Associated Press at the White House, Thursday, Jan. 8, 2009 in Washington.   (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
Vice President Dick Cheney responds to a question during an interview with the Associated Press at the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 8, 2009.
Vice President Dick Cheney responds to a question during an interview with the Associated Press at the White House in Washington, Thursday, Jan. 8, 2009.   (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)
In this Nov. 6, 2008 file photo, Vice President Dick Cheney applauds President Bush during an event at the White House in Washington.
In this Nov. 6, 2008 file photo, Vice President Dick Cheney applauds President Bush during an event at the White House in Washington.   (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Why did he fight this order so much if he did not have the intent to leave with these papers? I'm guessing that a lot of it will not be there. - Plaintiff Stanley I. Kutler, emeritus professor of history and law at the University of Wisconsin Law School

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
7 comments
VIEWING:
 
IN RESPONSE:
Caps
Jan 22, 09 12:04 PM CST
Come 2012, you wish.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Lula
Jan 20, 09 8:22 AM CST
Such a poor excuse of a man. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
nick
Jan 20, 09 9:52 AM CST
Whatever happened to "trust, but verify"? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
christine_m
Jan 20, 09 9:53 AM CST
I agree with the academic, I worry that those boxes will be empty... there will be no way of recovering the papers by them. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Mad
Jan 20, 09 4:20 PM CST
Why anyone would trust any Republican is beyond me. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.