Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Crime Labs Employ Shoddy Science: Report

Experts will call for independent agency to oversee forensics

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 5, 2009 9:08 AM CST

(Newser) – The country's crime labs are seriously deficient, according to a new report that's expected to shake up the field of forensics, the New York Times reports. Evidence portrayed as incontrovertible is often far from it, says the report, which Congress commissioned from the National Academy of Sciences. Forensic analysis often falls to poorly trained technicians who then exaggerate the accuracy of their methods in court.

The report—expected to give ammunition to defense lawyers nationwide—urges that forensic practices be upgraded and standardized. It also calls for the creation of an independent agency to regulate the field. One scientist who helped select the report's authors said federal law enforcement agencies resent the intervention of mainstream science in the courts and sought to derail the report.

A forensic scientist trainee looks over bullet casings at the Virginia State Forensics lab in Richmond, Va., Thursday, Jul. 17, 2008.
A forensic scientist trainee looks over bullet casings at the Virginia State Forensics lab in Richmond, Va., Thursday, Jul. 17, 2008.   (AP Photo/Steve Helber)
A new report strongly criticizes law enforcement's methods forensic methods including fingerprinting, firearms identification and analysis of bite marks, blood spatter, hair and handwriting.
A new report strongly criticizes law enforcement's methods forensic methods including fingerprinting, firearms identification and analysis of bite marks, blood spatter, hair and handwriting.   (AP GRAPHIC)
Congress asked the National Academy of Sciences to assess the forensic techniques used by law enforcement after a series of widely publicized crime laboratory failures.
Congress asked the National Academy of Sciences to assess the forensic techniques used by law enforcement after a series of widely publicized crime laboratory failures.   (AP Photo/Adam Rountree)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

I’m sure that every defense attorney in the country is waiting for this report to come out. There are going to be challenges to fingerprints and firearms evidence and the general lack of empirical grounding.
- A reader of a draft copy

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 2 of 2 comments
Guest
Feb 5, 2009 4:56 AM CST
It's a no brainer: This requires money.
Thinker
Feb 5, 2009 1:12 AM CST
It's a no brainer: forensic scientists work for the state; they WANT the evidence to convict. Independent labs should have been the norm all along.

More Newser Stories

Caylee's Killer May Have Put Heart Sticker Over Her Mouth

Police Line-of-Duty Deaths Up 13%

Deportation Program May Raise Crime: Report

US Will Review Rash of Police Deaths

US Agencies Link Up to Spy on ... You


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne