Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Man Tries to Order Priciest Starbucks Drink Ever Total cost: $23.60 »

New Facebook Fine Print Irks Users in Privacy Tug-of-War

Clause giving site permanent license to content slammed

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 17, 2009 4:46 AM CST

(Newser) – An outcry over a terms of service change has forced Facebook's founder to reassure users that they still own and control their own information, the New York Times reports. The update—which remains unchanged—removed a provision that said users could delete their content at any time, and added a clause saying users’ content would be retained even after accounts are terminated.

Facebook spokesmen stressed that the company's philosophy of users owning their information was unchanged, and that the update was intended to reflect user behavior. Comments left by users, for example, will not vanish if an account is deleted, they said. Some users, protesting that the new terms mean "Facebook owns you," have deactivated their accounts. Legal experts say Facebook's fine print isn't much different from many other websites.

Users are up in arms over the latest update to Facebook's terms of service, which gives the site permanent license to users' conten, even if an account is deleted.
Users are up in arms over the latest update to Facebook's terms of service, which gives the site permanent license to users' conten, even if an account is deleted.   (AP Photo/Medill, News Service, Lillian Cunningham)
Users are up in arms over the latest update to Facebook's terms of service, which gives the site permanent license to users' content, even if an account is deleted.
Users are up in arms over the latest update to Facebook's terms of service, which gives the site permanent license to users' content, even if an account is deleted.   (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, file)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We certainly did not—and did not intend—to create any new right or interest for Facebook in users' data by issuing the new terms. - Facebook spokesman Barry Schnitt

Zuckerberg’s response to the protest is just the modern version of ‘Ignore the fine print, ma’am, just sign here.’
- New Yorker writer Sasha Frere-Jones

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
Guest
Feb 18, 2009 11:37 PM CST
the machines are taking control
nick
Feb 18, 2009 6:08 AM CST
Bush has been listening to you for the last 8 years. How in the world did you even survive that experience? Let's talk cameras. Cameras at stop lights are fine with me. Cameras in retail stores serve as a crime deterrent, and many, many crimes, including murder, have been solved because of them. Parking lots, school grounds, and shopping center lots are three other useful locations. How about webcams? Tons of them. Do you consider that a violation? If you do, then just stay out of the areas where they are located. Your choice! BTW, sex offenders do lurk in large numbers on social web sites, where the pickings are rather easy.
nick
Feb 17, 2009 6:27 AM CST
If you have something to hide, maybe you don't belong on Facebook. For instance, if a sex offender is offended by the new policy, it's probably a good policy. If privacy is your main issue, stay off of social websites!

More Newser Stories

Top Apps Download Your Whole Address Book

Pinterest's New Member: Mark Zuckerberg

Experts Find Key Internet Encryption Flaw

Automakers Pushing 'Connected' Cars

Google, Facebook Yank Content as India Cracks Down


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne