Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Darwin Skeptics Separate Mind From Gray Matter

Debate focuses on whether the brain and mind function in tandem

By Wesley Oliver,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 21, 2009 6:24 PM CST

(Newser) – To undermine Darwinian theories about the emergence of life, skeptics have a new weapon in mind: the brain, NPR reports. They’re challenging the notion that a cluster of cells could produce such high-level mental processes as consciousness and free will. “It doesn’t hang together,” says one neurosurgeon, who argues that an intelligent designer created the brain and molded the universe.

But a Yale neurologist insists that the mind evolves along with the brain, which “can do things that can plausibly cause consciousness and self-awareness, so the argument really just falls on its face,” he explains. Not so, says the neurosurgeon, who argues that near-death experiences point to a mind that functions independent of the physical brain.

A century and a half after Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution, some still doubt its ability to explain the emergence of human beings and other forms of life.
A century and a half after Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution, some still doubt its ability to explain the emergence of human beings and other forms of life.   (AP Photo/The Granger Collection)
In this undated photo provided by the Detroit Institute of Arts, The Thinker, cast in 1904, by French sculptor Auguste Rodin is shown.
In this undated photo provided by the Detroit Institute of Arts, "The Thinker," cast in 1904, by French sculptor Auguste Rodin is shown.   (AP Photo/Courtesy Detroit Institute of Arts via Grand Rapids Press)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The question is, is there something else, in addition to the material properties of the brain, that we need to invoke to have an adequate explanation for the mind? I think there is. - Michael Egnor,
State University of New York, Stony Brook

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 43 comments
freethemall
Dec 14, 2009 9:57 PM CST
Man! Talk about false choices; there is absolutely no reason to think that IF (I can't over emphasize the "IF")... if it were true that the mind functions independent of the physical brain, this does NOT invalidate Darwin's theory of evolution, which is a theory of how PHYSICAL organisms evolve through the mechanism of natural selection. It is not a theory of how life (or consciousness} originated.
Guest
Feb 24, 2009 1:00 AM CST
I disagree.
Guest
Feb 24, 2009 12:56 AM CST
I think evolution is what some really smart scientists created from facts to make people who don't know the facts feel queasy. Therefore I'm a person who doesn't believe in evolution because it uses facts to support the hard evidence for which I have no use for. Facts are bad, even though I don't have any hard evidence to support my claim. But just the mention of the word facts should bring a little credence to my magical belief. Thank you. Now back to our regularly scheduled program.

More Newser Stories

'Darwin Day' Celebrated in Rural US, Quietly

Darwin's 'Survival of the Fittest' Disputed

Creation Has Potential, Doesn't Evolve

Students School Kirk Cameron on Darwin

Brits Hunt Stolen Darwin Notes


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne