Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Misguided Cartoonist Has 'Right to Fail': Parker

Image was easily misread, but it's just a cartoon

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 25, 2009 9:18 AM CST

(Newser) – The New York Post cartoon that has Al Sharpton up in arms was poorly thought out, to be sure, writes Kathleen Parker in the Washington Post. It "was offensive for reasons unrelated to race," she argues, but it’s important to remember that “outrage is out of proportion to the offense, and demands for retributive justice are more dangerous than a lousy cartoon.”

“Cops-kill-chimp/stimulus-bill-bad is not the stuff of revelation,” Parker notes. "It is literal, blunt, and unclever." Even so, cartoonist Sean Delonas had a “right to fail and to offend others in pursuit of an ideal,” she writes, and she channels the late Doug Marlette to remind "all those upset by this cartoon that the freedom to offend is the very same freedom that allows them to protest when their feelings are hurt."

This cartoon image provided by the New York Post appeared in the Post's Page Six Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009.
This cartoon image provided by the New York Post appeared in the Post's Page Six Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009.   (AP Photo/New York Post)
New York State Senator Eric Adams stands in front of the New York Post building holding a cartoon that ran in the Post Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009, in New York.
New York State Senator Eric Adams stands in front of the New York Post building holding a cartoon that ran in the Post Wednesday, Feb. 18, 2009, in New York.   (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Demands for retributive justice are more dangerous than a lousy cartoon. - Kathleen Parker

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 12 comments
Toon
Feb 26, 2009 9:24 PM CST
The Secret Service has interviewed high school students for saying a lot less threatening things about Bush 43. The guy may have a 1st Amendment Right to say it but others also have a 1st Amendment right to express how angry it made them.
Toon
Feb 26, 2009 9:20 PM CST
A person of entitlement would be someone who got a cushy job because his father's golfing buddy is the CEO.
Shannonals
Feb 25, 2009 2:53 AM CST
"Person of entitlement" What an ignorant comment. I don't disagree that anyone but Al Sharpton should be leading th charge against the Washington Post, but comments like yours Timinator2K only validate Sharpton.

More Newser Stories

Court: Call to Shoot Obama Is Free Speech

Ex-Editor Sues 'Racist' NY Post

ACLU: Lobbyist Rules Restrict Free Speech

Murdoch Sorry for Cartoon

NAACP Demands Firing of Post Cartoonist


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne