Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Fed Bailout Spawns More 'Zombie' Banks

Fed lifelines preserve banks that, frankly, are better off dead

By Clay Dillow,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 26, 2009 9:40 AM CST

(Newser) – The Federal Reserve’s aggressive lending to banks has helped avert financial collapse, but it may have created some monsters as well, the Wall Street Journal reports. A research paper from the University of Chicago suggests that while federal aid has succeeded some in thawing frozen credit markets, it has also sustained weak banks laden with toxic assets. These “zombie' banks otherwise would have died, allowing stronger institutions to absorb their bad assets.

By allowing banks to borrow against their mortgage-backed securities, the Fed's Term Securities Lending Facility is helping clear the credit logjam but causing another. "The weak are afraid to sell such assets because doing so would wipe them out, while strong institutions don't want to buy because they are holding out for a fire sale," writes Mark Gongloff. Bernanke’s recently-announced Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility may raise similar problems.

A Bank of America branch office is shown Sunday, Jan. 25, 2009 in New York.
A Bank of America branch office is shown Sunday, Jan. 25, 2009 in New York.   (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2009, before the Senate Banking Committee.
Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2009, before the Senate Banking Committee.   (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Central bank intervention to lend against all manner of collateral may not be an unmitigated blessing.
- Douglas Diamond and Raghuram Rajan
of the University of Chicago

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 2 of 2 comments
Guest
Feb 27, 2009 4:46 AM CST
Depends on how many banks and jobs you want to lose and how many deposits you want to actually have to cover with cash.
Guest
Feb 26, 2009 8:21 PM CST
In other words, the non-government molested Free Market would have taken care of itself.

More Newser Stories

Investors Urge Reluctant Fed to Buy Mortgage Debt

Fed Pumps $19B Into Market

Fed Earns Record $45B

Credit Crunch Pinches Entire Lending System

How the Crisis Changed Bernanke


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne