Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

NH Weighs 'Communism,' aka Seat-Belt Law

New Hampshire battles over finally passing a seat-belt law

By Katherine Thompson,  Newser Staff

Posted Mar 18, 2009 11:03 AM CDT

(Newser) – The accusations of creating a "nanny state" are ringing out, which must mean it's time for New Hampshire to debate legislating the use of seatbelts. The only state without a law requiring adults to buckle up, the "Live Free or Die" state is embroiled in a battle over whether to join the crowd, the Wall Street Journal reports.

The case for instituting the law isn't complex: It will save lives and make the state eligible for $3.7 million in federal funds. The counterargument is also simple: Granite Staters don't want the government telling them what to do. "People don't want it," says one lawmaker, who gets around on a Harley—without a helmet, as if that needs mentioning. "It's an insult to their intelligence."

Seat-belt fastening is a law that Virginia can live with, but New Hampshire isn't so sure they agree.
Seat-belt fastening is a law that Virginia "can live with," but New Hampshire isn't so sure they agree.   (©Daquella manera)
Since Maine passed a seat-belt law 14 years ago, New Hampshire is the only state not to require adults to buckle up.
Since Maine passed a seat-belt law 14 years ago, New Hampshire is the only state not to require adults to buckle up.   (©TheTruthAbout...)
New Hampshire's Senate Majority Leader says she doesn't like mandating behavior, but increased congestion in the state makes it more dangerous to drive without a seat belt.
New Hampshire's Senate Majority Leader says she doesn't like mandating behavior, but increased congestion in the state makes it more dangerous to drive without a seat belt.   (©dougtone)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 14 comments
oldgoat
Mar 19, 2009 8:18 AM CDT
Since the states usually end up paying for the medical care of people after their health insurance runs out I'd say that they do have some say in the matter. If you want to not wear a seat belt then sign a release that says the gov won't be paying for you health care and the hospital won't have to eat the costs of it. Just take you home and let your family and friends take care of you as best they can.
northeast
Mar 19, 2009 6:45 AM CDT
Libertarian = Anarchy?
northeast
Mar 19, 2009 6:45 AM CDT
There's a sign at the state border that says "Seatbelts for minors, common sense for all." Basically, the idea is that people should be completely free to make idiotic decisions on their own terms.

More Newser Stories

GOP Lawmakers Want to Repeal Gay Marriage in NH

NH Bill Would Require Bible Class in Schools

The Elephants in Romney's Room

Rick Santorum Falls Hard

Romney: We Made History


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne