Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


7

AIG Sues US Over Tax Payments

Share

(Newser) – Even as Washington rails against AIG’s bonus giveaway, the insurer is quietly suing the government for $306 million in tax payments, the New York Times reports. AIG’s case hinges largely on its use of offshore tax havens, including one entity that handles executive compensation. It also says it overpaid the government after a 2004 accounting scandal forced it to restate records.

Other parts of the case are less flashy, involving carry-backs, refund claims, and other tax-related payments. The Internal Revenue Service denied the company’s initial claim last year, so now the company is suing its majority shareholder—the US government. “AIG is taking this action to ensure that it is not required to pay more than its fair share of taxes,” said a spokesman.

Women walk in front of the AIG building in Tokyo yesterday.
Women walk in front of the AIG building in Tokyo yesterday.   (AP Photo)
AIG Chairman Edward Liddy testifies on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.
AIG Chairman Edward Liddy testifies on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.   (AP Photo)
AIG, after getting billions in bailout money, is in effect suing for more, and, the New York Times notes, using taxpayer money to do it.
AIG, after getting billions in bailout money, is in effect suing for more, and, the New York Times notes, using taxpayer money to do it.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
7 comments
VIEWING:
 
wwwonderer
Mar 20, 09 10:52 AM CDT
gotta love the use of the phrase 'fair share'. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
NewserGary
Mar 20, 09 11:28 AM CDT
Should have let them go bust... So many smaller insurers would have gotten market share. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
TerrifiedCitizen
Mar 20, 09 2:20 PM CDT
I think “bonuses” might sound like a hand-out to hourly workers or someone who’s never worked in sales or management, and that's part of the rationale driving all the disbelief and media hysteria. To bring it down to a more fundamental equation and give it perspective, let's suppose the going market price for your employment services is $20.00 per hour. The company makes you an offer of $15.00 per hour but says if you meet this list of targets or goals that they have, we will give you the added $5.00 per hour that you would have made at years end in the form of a bonus... it simply ties your compensation to your effort. Now, the company decides the goals that the employee must achieve, and if they're intelligent, it’s tied to overall fiscal health in addition to other performance goals. The salary range may be subjective and established by a number of free-market factors; I'm not saying some of these individuals might not be overpaid; but I do know that these career people often constitute a different breed of employee who work many more hours, nights and weekends away from their families doing many things that most workers won't… just for the opportunity to operate in these pay ranges. I may be off a little, but I don't think the average hourly employee can even relate to a working environment like that; much less want to suffer the years of academic training and experience just to get the chance to sink or swim in positions of such weighty responsibility with sharks at your back at every turn. So, if you haven't been there, maybe you shouldn't throw rocks until you have an informed point of reference. It would also probably help to read up on AIG's changes & progress at: http://www.aig.com/home_385_131629.html Lastly, the money promised and paid to these employees really pales in comparison to the funds many of these politicians received in contributions for their wildly expensive campaigns, and have now doled back out with interest (using your money) to the same BBB companies (Big Beautiful Business). The hysteria and hype in Washington is designed to appease the majority of mostly uninformed voters and at the same time provides a media circus event to draw attention away from this legal but corrupting relationship between politics and business... which is what really needs to change. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
r0b0nd7
Mar 20, 09 6:08 PM CDT
You're right in that the media is turning AIG into a terrorist organization of sorts, garnering an overly intense hatred from Americans. But I personally don't see how a company can tank, accept bailout money from tax payers, and then pay its execs their normal bonuses as if nothing happened. Like you said, the agreement on bonuses is tied in to the companies fiscal health, and yet the upper-level employees, some of whom should have done their job better to prevent all this, received their bonus incentives anyway. I'm glad some of them came to their senses and returned the money.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
gregconquest
Mar 20, 09 6:44 PM CDT
TC, this *is* the same post! You're spamming us with this. Please, stop! You. Are. Repeating. Yourself. Word. For. Word. This is not the place to spread some mantra no matter how good it might be. I'm going to start flagging you if I see any more.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.