Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
12

Don't Listen to Krugman— This Plan Might Work

Pearlstein lays into fellow columnist

Share

(Newser) – Even before the full details were released, critics were bashing the Treasury's public-private asset purchase plan; Paul Krugman predicted it would fail and lead the country into depression (not to speak of the writer into despair). Steven Pearlstein begs to differ, and the markets seem to agree. For the Washington Post columnist, the Geithner plan is better than nationalization: There's now "a good chance of bringing significant amounts of private capital back into the financial system."

It's fair to say that the government is shouldering most of the downside risk—but Washington had to in order to lure spooked investors at all. With added liquidity we should see that asset-backed securities aren't worthless, and even for those that are, "nationalization doesn't make the bad loans go away." And if nothing else, at least "the conversation has turned from AIG bonuses to the question of how to revive the global financial system."

Paul Krugman, Princeton University professor of economics and international affairs, after he was announced the winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics Monday, Oct. 13, 2008.
Paul Krugman, Princeton University professor of economics and international affairs, after he was announced the winner of the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics Monday, Oct. 13, 2008.   (AP Photo/Mel Evans)
Tim Geithner, Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke and Sheila Bair at the White House yesterday, after Geithner announced the Treasury's public-private asset purchase plan.
Tim Geithner, Barack Obama, Ben Bernanke and Sheila Bair at the White House yesterday, after Geithner announced the Treasury's public-private asset purchase plan.   (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
A trader works in the S&P 500 futures pit at the CME Group Tuesday, March 10, 2009, in Chicago.
A trader works in the S&P 500 futures pit at the CME Group Tuesday, March 10, 2009, in Chicago.   (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

One can quibble that the proposed deals are too sweet or not sweet enough, but I can assure you that the folks at Treasury, having consulted widely with investors, have a better feel for those details than even the most sagacious newspaper columnists. -

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
12 comments
VIEWING:
 
Derni
Mar 24, 09 8:38 AM CDT
Well stated-and so far-true. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Toon
Mar 24, 09 8:41 AM CDT
What's good for Wall St. isn't necessarily good for the nation. After the last few years, endorsement by stock traders rings rather hollow. I want Krugman to be wrong, but he has been right pretty consistently in the past. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Robert_Dada
Mar 24, 09 9:20 AM CDT
You are so right
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
woody66
Mar 24, 09 10:18 AM CDT
The private investors will share the first 15% of downside risk so they will have skin in the game. They will be the ones to properly value the assets which is the aim here. Krugman seems to prefer full nationalization of these banks. It's a feasible option but would there be broad support ?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Snowleopard
Mar 24, 09 3:10 PM CDT
private investors only have to pay half of the first 15%. That's only a 7% downside. What a gift.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.