NCAA Tourney as Boring as Ever
Popularity has sucked all the charm out of the tournament
By Nick McMaster, Newser Staff
Posted Apr 4, 2009 8:00 AM CDT
In this Nov. 17, 2008 file photo, Villanova coach Jay Wright reacts to an official's call as his team plays Fordham in the first half of an NCAA college basketball game in Villanova, Pa.   (AP Photo/H. Rumph Jr., File)

(Newser) – In the '60s and '70s, the NCAA tournament was boring because UCLA seemingly always won. These days, "instead of UCLA winning it every year, there are now between five and nine UCLAs that can win it every year," Charles Pierce writes for Slate. "It's just as sterile and dynastic as it used to be." It’s oligarchy rather than monarchy, but it feels just as stale.

Take this year’s Final Four: Villanova, North Carolina, Michigan State, and UConn have appeared in the Final Four a total of 12 times since 2000. The tournament has become such a commodity, Pierce laments, that its "grandiosity brings with it a demand for consistency, for an easily defined cast of characters, a rack of brand names consonant with the corporate class that's come to run the thing."

View 1 more image
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
You Might Like
Be the first to comment on this story.