Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Strunk & White Is Still a Crock at 50

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 14, 2009 2:10 PM CDT

(Newser) – Strunk and White’s classic writing guide, The Elements of Style, has some “harmless” things to say about style, Geoffrey Pullum writes in the Chronicle of Higher Education, but its assault on grammar is unforgivable. The “toxic mix of purism, atavism, and personal eccentricity is not underpinned by a proper grounding in English grammar,” Pullum writes of the book, 50 this month.

Though Pullum takes exception to some of Strunk and White’s pronouncements, particularly about passive clauses, the real problem is how poorly the book is written. Its “contempt for its own grammatical dictates seems almost willful, as if the authors were flaunting the fact that the rules don’t apply to them.” The book does not deserve an anniversary fete: “Strunk and White are just wrong about the facts of English syntax.”

Strunk and White.
Strunk and White.   (©ToastyKen)
A detail of a copy of a 1932 draft of Ernest Hemingway's book Death in the Afternoon.
A detail of a copy of a 1932 draft of Ernest Hemingway's book Death in the Afternoon.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The result is a nation of educated people who know they feel vaguely anxious and insecure whenever they write "however" or "than me" or "was" or "which," but can't tell you why. The land of the free in the grip of The Elements of Style. -

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 2 of 2 comments
Are_you--Nobody--Too
Sep 12, 2009 6:13 AM CDT
A big part of it's appeal is that it is such a slim style book. It's a beginner's guide, not the end-all-and-be-all of English grammar and usage.
kokuaguy
Apr 15, 2009 7:05 AM CDT
One first needs an understanding of the basic rules of composition before presuming to have the ability to write effective prose that violates them. I'm skeptical of the need to attack so strongly a tool that has served so many so well for so long, though I admit that I haven't read the article from COHE. (Chronicle? Really?)

More Newser Stories

High School English: A Waste of Time?

Let's Rethink How We Teach English

You're 'Me,' Not 'Myself,' and Other Grammar Peeves

Emoticons Invade Academia

Colleges Don’t Care if Kids Can Write


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne