Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Abu Ghraib Guards Say They Were Scapegoats

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted May 2, 2009 10:32 AM CDT

(Newser) – Lawyers for US soldiers convicted of abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison say the recently released CIA memos prove their clients were just following orders, the Times of London reports. Some of the dozen soldiers who were convicted plan to appeal, arguing that the Bush administration kept quiet during their trials and let them take the heat.

“What we know is that we had at the time a rogue government that created an environment where this sort of conduct was condoned, if not encouraged,” said one lawyer whose client received a dishonorable discharge. “Once the pictures came out, the senior officials involved in the decision-making, they knew,” said the lawyer for convicted ringleader Charles Graner. “They knew they had to have a cover story. It was the ‘bad apples.’”

The renovated Abu Ghraib prison, now renamed Baghdad Central Prison, in February.
The renovated Abu Ghraib prison, now renamed Baghdad Central Prison, in February.   (AP Photo)
Abu Ghraib prison in 2004.
Abu Ghraib prison in 2004.   (AP Photo)
Lynndie R. England in 2005.
Lynndie R. England in 2005.   (AP Photo)
Soldiers intimidate a detainee at Abu Ghraib, Dec. 12, 2003.
Soldiers intimidate a detainee at Abu Ghraib, Dec. 12, 2003.   (AP Photo)
A detainee in an outdoor solitary confinement cell talks with a military policeman at the Abu Ghraib prison on the outskirts of Baghdad in 2004.
A detainee in an outdoor solitary confinement cell talks with a military policeman at the Abu Ghraib prison on the outskirts of Baghdad in 2004.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 3 comments
mockingbird
May 3, 2009 5:26 AM CDT
Yes, they are guilty of war crimes. Moral ambiguity notwithstanding, we've got to hold the line somewhere. This might be splitting hairs, but even if we (realistically) realize that our standards will be breached, the standard must stay as a guidepost. "Our enemies" might engage in behavior as bad - or worse - but one would think that that's why we call them "our enemies". But, yes, they are also scapegoats - when this first came to light, anyone and everyone that I knew with even a vague association with the military could see that. I'd even venture to say that Karpinski was a scapegoat (to the extent that any general can be one); though she, too, is just as legally and morally liable for /her own/ action (or inaction), even in the face of conflicting orders, as her subordinates.
Doctor-Zaius
May 2, 2009 4:04 AM CDT
The only difference is that Hitler didn't hold pretend trials and convict them for following his orders.
Robert_Dada
May 2, 2009 3:36 AM CDT
And Nazi SS guards at death camps said they were only following orders. There comes a time in your life when you should know something is morally wrong and you refuse to consent to it, even if it means you will be discharged, fired, etc.

More Newser Stories

'We Were Just Pawns:' Lynndie England

Justice Memo Backed Torture Interrogations

The Last American Killed in Iraq

US Soldier Killed in Iraq Blackhawk Crash

Lynndie England Speech Canceled by Threats


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne