Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Cheney Spouts 'Red Herrings and Lies'

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted May 21, 2009 7:34 PM CDT

(Newser) – Today's speech was "classic Dick Cheney," writes Fred Kaplan in Slate, and he doesn't mean it as a compliment. The former VP "built a case on straw men, red herrings, and lies" and put his "Manichean worldview" on full display. Kaplan labels as "blatant evasion" a core part of Cheney's argument: that harsh interrogations were an essential part of a post-9/11 strategy that kept the country safe.

"The debate—or one of the debates—is, in fact, over whether or not the war on terror required 'tough interrogations,' as Cheney called them. Does he believe—should anyone else believe—that removing one chunk of this strategy would cause the whole edifice to topple? If these interrogations are so essential, why did President Bush stop them in 2004? And why haven't we been attacked since?"

Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Thursday, May 21, 2009.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Thursday, May 21, 2009.   (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Thursday, May 21, 2009.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Thursday, May 21, 2009.   (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Thursday, May 21, 2009.
Former Vice President Dick Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, Thursday, May 21, 2009.   (AP Photo/Luis M. Alvarez)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Former Vice President Cheney speaks at the American Enterprise Institute.   (YouTube)

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next »

What's wrong with assembling a truth commission, an independent body empowered to examine all the documents and subpoena witnesses, behind firmly closed doors? - Fred Kaplan, Slate

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 9 comments
kokuaguy
May 22, 2009 3:52 AM CDT
TC has hit the nail on the head. The investigation needs to establish beyond debate that the torture was designed to come up with some kind of link between 9/11 and Saddam Hussein in order to justify an illegal, unnecessary, catastrophic pre-emptive war on Iraq.
Newser001
May 22, 2009 3:16 AM CDT
The problem with torture, you'll always get an answer - right or wrong. You'll never really know if it's the truth. McCain is totally opposed to torture, as am I. If you've never served, you have no right to comment.
John
May 22, 2009 2:33 AM CDT
Then we must believe Fox Slime.

More Newser Stories

Biden, Cheney Trade Punches

Shut It, Cheney: White House

Cheney: Obama 'Won't Admit We're at War'

Biden the Second Most Powerful Vice Prez

Cheney Is a 'Maniacal' Hypocrite


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne