Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Sotomayor's Record Reveals Rigor, Little Else

Dispassionate rulings exhaustive, but show no larger vision

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted May 27, 2009 7:19 AM CDT

(Newser) – Sonia Sotomayor’s decisions “are not always a pleasure to read,” writes Adam Liptak of the New York Times, but “they are usually models of modern judicial craftsmanship.” They are exhaustive and technical, with even uncontroversial propositions justified with detailed footnotes. They also reveal strikingly little about her. Sotomayor avoids quotable language, has hinted at no larger vision, and has never ruled on abortion, the death penalty, gay rights, or national security.

In the one case that stands out—Ricci v. DeStefano, the thorny racial-discrimination case brought by firefighters in New Haven that will soon go before the Supreme Court, Sotomayor issued an unsigned decision with just one paragraph of reasoning, deferring to a lower court’s arguments. An upcoming case will also prove revealing: Sotomayor will soon weigh in on the case of Maher Arar, a Canadian who says American officials sent him to Syria to be tortured.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor speaks in a symposium at the Brooklyn Law School in this July 7, 2004 file photo.
Judge Sonia Sotomayor speaks in a symposium at the Brooklyn Law School in this July 7, 2004 file photo.   (AP Photo/Brooklyn Law School)
In this April 2003 photo, judge Sonia Sotomayor stands in front of the organization's official roll book during her induction ceremony in Philadelphia, Pa.
In this April 2003 photo, judge Sonia Sotomayor stands in front of the organization's official roll book during her induction ceremony in Philadelphia, Pa.   (AP Photo/American Philosophical Society, Linda Lloyd)
President Barack Obama announces federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor, right, as his nominee for the Supreme Court, May 26, 2009, in an East Room ceremony of the White House.
President Barack Obama announces federal appeals court judge Sonia Sotomayor, right, as his nominee for the Supreme Court, May 26, 2009, in an East Room ceremony of the White House.   (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 4 comments
Nwambe
May 28, 2009 9:58 AM CDT
Right, and sometimes you need someone who has experienced being POOR to understand what it's like, so that they CAN be treated equally under the law in the face of corporations who can spend millions of dollars on lawyers.
Nwambe
May 27, 2009 2:25 AM CDT
Are you kidding me? Really? That her experiences as a minority should help her sympathize with plaintiffs bringing cases to the Supreme Court makes her racist? Jesus, you can't be serious. She's expressed the same displeasure that the Supreme Court is packed with males who don't quite understand the problems posed by 51% of the population. Does that make her sexist, too? Or is she just telling a truth you're uncomfortable with?
Fondue
May 27, 2009 1:08 AM CDT
Do you have anything else?

More Newser Stories

Wise Latinas Embrace Their New Label

Blame Everyone Involved for Shallow Sotomayor Hearings

Sotomayor Wins Republicans' Backing

Sotomayor: Roe v. Wade Is 'Settled Law'

Sotomayor Pledges 'Fidelity to the Law'


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne