Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
43

We've Lost the War on Drugs

It's time for a new approach: Kristof

Share

(Newser) – The war on drugs has been waged for 40 years, but despite spending $44 billion annually, “the drugs have won,” writes Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times. A former police chief notes that “drugs are more readily available, at lower prices and higher levels of potency—the drug war is a dismal failure." It’s time to rethink our approach. “We need to be less ideological and more empirical,” Kristof urges.

During the drug war, the US prison population has soared, and cartels have enjoyed an earnings boost as tougher drug laws drive up prices, notes Kristof. A good first step toward improving the situation could be to offer legalized marijuana at certain licensed pharmacies in some states, writes Kristof. President Obama’s drug czar wants to push treatment rather than prison. Whatever form it takes, one thing is clear: we need to "grope toward a more effective strategy," Kristof concludes.

Soldiers secure the crime scene where a woman was killed in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, in April. Drug cartel wars in Mexico have cost more than 10,650 lives since December 2006.
Soldiers secure the crime scene where a woman was killed in Ciudad Juarez, Mexico, in April. Drug cartel wars in Mexico have cost more than 10,650 lives since December 2006.   (AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd)
The 'drugs have won' the war, writes Nicolas Kristof.
The 'drugs have won' the war, writes Nicolas Kristof.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

We spend seven times as much on drug interdiction, policing and imprisonment as on treatment. - Nicholas Kristof

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
43 comments
VIEWING:
 
paul123
Jun 14, 09 7:25 AM CDT
Shall we say the same of the war on poverty? We throw millions at it and the problem hasn't go away. No, we must fight the good fight on both fronts. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-12
IN RESPONSE:
shonangreg
Jun 14, 09 8:11 AM CDT
One is not a good fight; it is a wrong-headed battle *against* the freedom to pursue happiness. The other is a good fight -- just a rough one.
Vote up! Vote down!
+13
IN RESPONSE:
Mr.C
Jun 14, 09 8:39 AM CDT
good parallel paul ---- shaon.. google (or bing lol) some photos of happy meth addicts.
Vote up! Vote down!
-11
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Jun 14, 09 9:23 AM CDT
Mr. C, meth is not weed. No one mentioned meth in the article, they did mention weed.
Vote up! Vote down!
+9
IN RESPONSE:
Mr.C
Jun 14, 09 1:20 PM CDT
This article is about a "war on drugs" not a war on pot Fondue. The $44B mentioned is not anti-pot money, it is anti-drug. Not to mention that the suppliers are highly intertwined. Here is just one of your happy meth addicts - This one tried suicide while on meth and ended up in a wheelchair. Ahhh, the pursuit of happiness. . http://www.missoulian.com/articles/2007/02/11/news/local/news04.txt
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.