Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

High Court Won't Hear Challenge to Border Fence

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 15, 2009 2:47 PM CDT

(Newser) – The Supreme Court has refused to hear a challenge to the completion of the border fence between the US and Mexico, Fox News reports. Environmental groups, an Indian tribe, and the city of El Paso brought the challenge, contending that a fence will cut off access to the Rio Grande for religious, cultural, and municipal purposes. The Obama administration had encouraged the court to reject the case.

The petitioners also objected to the fence because its authorization, under then-Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff, required Congress to waive federal, state, and local laws applying to the agency. “If allowed to stand,” the petitioners’ brief stated, the “order would constitute an unprecedented expansion of agency authority to preempt state and local law without clear congressional authority and without any oversight by any court.”

The fence, in San Diego.
The fence, in San Diego.   (AP Photo)
Trucks cross the border in Tijuana, Mexico.
Trucks cross the border in Tijuana, Mexico.   (AP Photo)
A US Border Patrol agent patrols along the fence line of the U.S.-Mexico border in Nogales, Ariz.
A US Border Patrol agent patrols along the fence line of the U.S.-Mexico border in Nogales, Ariz.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
Rob
Jun 16, 2009 1:42 AM CDT
lthurman. We recently had a question of eminent domain here where I live. Not only was the land taken, but it was taken and given to private developers to construct a mall for the "greater good." You are incorrect in how it works. There is initial discussion and offers. But if these are turned down the land can be taken with simple statements of public good.
AdaptAndOvercome
Jun 15, 2009 9:04 AM CDT
Of course the judge ruled against the Environmental Groups and the Indian Tribes. How does this surprise anyone. They sighted religious reasons, but they are not White Christian groups with lots of tax free funding. So, they didn't stand a chance.
riffran
Jun 15, 2009 8:32 AM CDT
I bet Larasa, and Sotomeyer ar not pleased

More Newser Stories

News Flash, Rick Perry: Texas Border Is Safe

Texas Executes Mexican After Appeal Rejected

Mexican Drug Informants Import Violence to US

Border Fence Blamed for Ariz. Flooding

Supreme Court Will Hear Navy Sonar Appeal


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne