Fear, Not Fraud, May Have Won Iranian Election
By Harry Kimball, Newser Staff
Posted Jun 15, 2009 3:54 PM CDT
A Mousavi supporter.   (AP Photo)

(Newser) – A pre-election poll of Iranian voters favoring Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has been held up as proof that the election was fair. Not so, writes Nate Silver on FiveThirtyEight.com. The poll, conducted by Terror Free Tomorrow, found that 33.8% of respondents intended to vote for Ahmadinejad, versus 13.6% for Mir Hossein Mousavi. But a shocking 42.5% refused to answer or said they were undecided.

“They might not have told TFT whom they were planning to support,” Silver writes. “But that doesn't mean they were truly undecided.” In an authoritarian state, those unsure about their vote could be persuaded to toe the line. “This story really isn't about the way that the votes were counted,” Silver writes. "It's about whether Iran is capable at this point of having an election in which the democratic will of its electorate is properly reflected.”

View 3 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 10 comments
Jun 16, 2009 12:20 PM CDT
Who is bashing the old administration? Rove has made himself current. I wasn't referring to any Presidential election. I was referring to Harold See.
Jun 16, 2009 5:27 AM CDT
That's a wonderful article thanks for sharing it Kokuaguy.
Jun 16, 2009 2:28 AM CDT
Found a great piece about HAROLD SEE & KARL ROVE on Google (mahalo for the tip, deeb): http://www.theatlantic.com/doc...