Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


18

'Jane Roe' Arrested After Ruckus at Sotomayor Hearing

'You're wrong, Sotomayor,' plaintiff-turned-anti-abortion-activist screams

Share

(Newser) – Norma McCorvey, better known as “Jane Roe” from the landmark abortion-rights case Roe v. Wade, was arrested today after causing a ruckus at Sonia Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing, ABC News reports. McCorvey was removed from the Hart Senate Office Building and charged with unlawful conduct after she began to scream, “you’re wrong, Sotomayor, you’re wrong,” during proceedings.

McCorvey had earlier been among a group of anti-abortion activists standing outside the building holding signs that said “Stop All Abortions” or showed graphic pictures of aborted fetuses, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel adds. Though 1973’s Roe v. Wade decision specifically established McCorvey’s right to an abortion, she’s since become a staunch activist against the procedure.

Norma McCorvey also known as Jane Roe in the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision reads a statement March 15, 2000 in Washington DC.
Norma McCorvey also known as Jane Roe in the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision reads a statement March 15, 2000 in Washington DC.   (Getty Images)
A filled Senate Judiciary Committee room is seen today.
A filled Senate Judiciary Committee room is seen today.   (AP Photo)
Norma McCorvey, second from left, is seen at an anti-abortion protest May 16, 2009, in South Bend, Ind.
Norma McCorvey, second from left, is seen at an anti-abortion protest May 16, 2009, in South Bend, Ind.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

I’m here to overturn Roe and defeat Sotomayor’s nomination to the Supreme Court. She’s unworthy of the position. She’s Catholic. She’s even unworthy of taking communion because of her pro-abortion stance.
- Norma McCorvey

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
18 comments
VIEWING:
 
mayo68
Jul 13, 09 5:19 PM CDT
36 years later, and she still doesn't get it. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
godawgs
Jul 13, 09 5:25 PM CDT
maybe she had a change of heart.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
AmExpat
Jul 13, 09 5:50 PM CDT
Maybe you disagree with her opinion, but how can you say she doesn't "get it"? She's not a spectator in this debate- she was THE instigator all those decades ago. Maybe she can claim that life experience is the best teacher & she's gained in wisdom.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
drlarrymitchell
Jul 13, 09 8:34 PM CDT
If she was so certain that she was correct in the early seventies, but changed her mind- HOW can anyone be certain of her stance now? Fact is, she insisted upon being listened to in 1973, then changed her mind on the objective correlative and wants to be listened to now.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
drlarrymitchell
Jul 13, 09 8:37 PM CDT
The point being, she felt one way and wanted her opinion to be legitimate, and then changed her mind and wants that point to be considered legitimate. Okay, fair enough- people do change their minds on occasion- but want she really wants is for us to respect her CHOICE (both before and after) while she is unwilling to do that for other people.
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.