Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Battle Heats Up Over Green Building Codes

Better construction seen as best chance of saving energy

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 18, 2009 7:44 AM CDT

(Newser) – Authorities are trying to hammer together tighter nationwide building codes to save energy and combat climate change, the New York Times reports. Experts say requiring buildings to be more efficient will do more to save energy than any other single policy move, but codes remain weak to nonexistent across half the country. Campaigners warn that inefficient building now is locking in energy profligacy for decades to come.

The construction industry is fighting moves to tighten codes, saying that requirements for energy-saving materials and extra insulation will add thousands of dollars to the cost of new homes and further damage the housing market. Austin, however—which requires new buildings to be audited for energy efficiency—says upgrades for efficiency pay for themselves within 5 years and keep saving homeowners hundreds of dollars a year afterwards.

At least seven states have virtually no rules requiring new buildings to be energy efficient.
At least seven states have virtually no rules requiring new buildings to be energy efficient.   (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Campaigners pushing for better building codes say too many builders are using too little insulation, meaning energy will be wasted for many years to come.
Campaigners pushing for better building codes say too many builders are using too little insulation, meaning energy will be wasted for many years to come.   (Shutter Stock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Energy building codes are the single biggest opportunity to save the environment while saving the consumer money.
- Hal Harvey, chief executive of ClimateWorks, a group seeking to tackle global warming.

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 14 comments
kokuaguy
Jul 20, 2009 7:10 AM CDT
Mahalo for the disclosure. The discussion here shouldn't be about political philosophy, it should be about whether and when government regulations should impose reasonable codes addressing energy savings that can help us to achieve energy independence. For instance, just last night as I was walking in a residential area of Honolulu it struck me how many windows in apartments use those terribly inefficient glass jealousy panel windows and are at the same time air conditioned. Perhaps in the South you may be familiar with them but I came here from Colorado where the cold winters make such windows out of the question. I still remember putting up the storm windows in the winter in one house we lived in. Forcing builders to use more economical window design could add cost up front but down the road the electric bills would be far less I think. One doesn't have to be a believer in global warming to buy into the idea of conserving energy I would hope. Then I got to thinking about an inexpensive retrofit that might be possible for these stupid jalousie windows and I thought it might be possible to engineer a thin enough glass panel with a vacuum window that could slide into the existing brackets. I don't know if the debate with you sparked that thought but I'm going to look into it. Maybe I won't always be so poor.
Fondue
Jul 19, 2009 7:43 AM CDT
CS, I'll be sure to let my associates know not to hire any contractors from GA from no on to ensure we don't hire you.
Fondue
Jul 19, 2009 7:40 AM CDT
"Fondue.........your not the sharpest tool in the shed are you...." Does that make you feel better about yourself? I might have actually finished your comment if it weren't for the attack.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne