Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


3

Despite Obama Push, Banks Often Prefer Foreclosing

Share

(Newser) – There’s a big problem with government efforts to keep delinquents in their homes by modifying mortgages: Banks would usually rather foreclose, economists tell the Washington Post. Lenders are only interested in modification for the small group of borrowers who will keep paying only if they get help. For those who’ll eventually default either way, they’d rather foreclose immediately, avoiding a costly delay.

Nor do banks have much incentive to help borrowers they think could, with enough sacrifice, catch up on payments. “There is going to be this narrow slice of borrowers for which modifications is the right answer,” says a Mortgage Bankers Association researcher. But the Obama administration says that the modification program is meeting expectations, with more than 20,000 modifications a week.

In this file photo, a realtor's sign is seen on the lawn of a foreclosed home in Egg Harbor Township, NJ.
In this file photo, a realtor's sign is seen on the lawn of a foreclosed home in Egg Harbor Township, NJ.   (AP Photo)
In this file photo, a foreclosure sign sits outside a home for sale in Phoenix.
In this file photo, a foreclosure sign sits outside a home for sale in Phoenix.   (AP Photo)
A foreclosed home is shown in Mountain View, Calif., May 28, 2009.
A foreclosed home is shown in Mountain View, Calif., May 28, 2009.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

These are the people who will get a second job, borrow from their family to keep up. From a cold-blooded profit-maximizing standpoint, these are the people the banks will help the least. - Paul S. Willen, senior economist at the Boston Fed, on borrowers who can self-cure

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
3 comments
VIEWING:
 
Nwambe
Jul 28, 09 9:59 AM CDT
On so many millions of ill-advised loans, the TARP program can only do so much, and it is doing just that. The majority of homeowners took ill-advised loans, and expected the government to fix the problem. It has, but it has helped those who can help themselves. The banks, after all, are part of a free-market system - If they prefer to foreclose, there is little recourse, and if the government chose to intervene, it would be disastrous for the American system. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
Newser001
Jul 28, 09 10:10 AM CDT
Just like when we bailed the banks out, eh...? If it were a free-market system we would have let them fail. They knew what they were creating with the sub-prime market... no one's that stupid. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+5
Toon
Jul 28, 09 3:11 PM CDT
Banks would rather foreclose and let the property sit and rot rather than lower interest rates and make a smaller profit. The deal is that fraudulently high interest rates have stripped too many home owners of all assets when honest loans could have been kept current. Now that the bank has everything they would rather kick their customers to the curb and get nothing more out of the property. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.