Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Liberals Near Revolt Over Health Care Deal

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 29, 2009 8:29 PM CDT

(Newser) – Blue Dogs had a good day, but now liberals are howling. After the conservative Democrats managed to shift health care legislation to the center, progressive Democrats say they might mount a rebellion of their own, report Politico and the Hill. They're mostly upset that Henry Waxman agreed to water down a government-financed public option for insurance. “I don’t think it would pass the House," said Barney Frank, who answered with an emphatic yes when asked if progressives would be willing to gum up the legislative works as Blue Dogs had done.

“It’s unacceptable. We’re not going to vote for anything that doesn’t have a robust public plan," said Lynn Woolsey of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. They're working up a letter to leaders and plan to get 50 signatures. Still, the deal with Blue Dogs gets the House legislation moving again (though progressives won a delay in the committee markup) and Max Baucus' Senate committee also reported progress. President Obama seemed happy, though he told a town hall meeting that it might now be October before a bill comes up for a vote, notes Reuters.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a news conference on health care reform Wednesday, July 22.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi during a news conference on health care reform Wednesday, July 22.   (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., in May.
Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., in May.   (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Waxman made a deal that is unacceptable. We signed a pledge to reject any plan that doesn’t include a robust public option, and this plan doesn’t have a robust public option. - Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-NY

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 36 comments
Snarfeh
Jul 31, 2009 7:30 AM CDT
Thank ya and ditto to you. Well..I don't pay for anyone right now, but if I could, I would. I read today that Pelosi finally got on *my* bandwagon and pinpointed the insurance industry as a large part of the problem. Now, if she would add Big Pharma to the game, we might be hot on a trail. I'm not against making a profit, but I am against making a profit from just being effing evil and using semantics to nitpick, like how Reader64481089's wife was treated. How much money does a person need to feel safe & secure??? I'd be happy right now with a 40k per year job even though it's under my scale.
Snarfeh
Jul 31, 2009 7:24 AM CDT
I dunno, deebles. There's no easy answer for that. As long as their other fears are played upon, as long as some people are unwilling or unable to oen their minds, as long as people don't try to educate themselves somehow, some way....hell, I almost wish you hadn't posed that question because thinking about it makes me sad, but it's a valid question. It's just not answerable, I guess...
BlueAyez
Jul 31, 2009 5:27 AM CDT
Fixing such a massive problem will have to be a multi-stage project taking a couple of years to organize.

More Newser Stories

Boehner Cancels Payroll Vote

Warren Shows Liberals How It's Done

Pelosi's 3 'Super' Picks: Becerra, Clyburn, Van Hollen

Debt Deal's Winners and Losers

Ark. Blue Dog Mike Ross Won't Seek Reelection


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne