Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


14

Flickr Lost 3K of My Photos: Angry Blogger

Slams service after hacker permanently deletes costly images

Share

(Newser) – Flickr has earned a blogger’s harsh rebuke for losing 3,000 of his photos, Gawker reports. A hacker was able to permanently delete the photos by attaching a Hotmail account to Morgan Tepsic’s Flickr account, and Tepsic is livid that Flickr didn’t better protect work he says cost him thousands to develop. He’s no fan of its customer-service or support operations, either.

Tepsic hammers Flickr’s support, saying he was told the firm had no phones—despite an online video showing otherwise. “Not only was I being lied to,” he blogs, “I was obviously not being heard thus feeling that my 4 years of patronage of the FlickrPro account was meaningless to them and I might as well screw off.” It’s not the first time a story like this has emerged, Gawker notes, citing a previous case of 1,200 lost photos—and no apparent backup.

This undated screen grab provided by Yahoo Inc. shows photo editing tools for their popular online photo-sharing service, Flickr.
This undated screen grab provided by Yahoo Inc. shows photo editing tools for their popular online photo-sharing service, Flickr.   (AP Photo/Yahoo Inc.)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
14 comments
VIEWING:
 
atomick
Aug 5, 09 9:59 AM CDT
If you photos were that important why would you entrust them to Flickr without having a back up of your own? That's just stupid. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+15
IN RESPONSE:
shonangreg
Aug 5, 09 12:18 PM CDT
Absolutely. If you're not backing up your photos and data, you have no one but yourself to blame when they get lost. Flickr never was about securely saving photos. It has always been about presenting them. The headline should be changed to: "Idiot Kicks Himself For Not Backing Up Photos On Flickr. Lashes Out At Everyone Else In The Process."
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
Fondue
Aug 5, 09 10:00 AM CDT
Wow...flickr does suck. But, you get what you pay for...I guess. If these photos were so valuable (and I do not doubt that), perhaps a more appropriate investment in their protection was in order. How can you expect a $25/year "Pro" account to mean anything you have invested thousands to make? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
schmidtkoff
Aug 5, 09 10:25 AM CDT
she needs to get her own dot.com Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Jes
Aug 5, 09 10:56 AM CDT
So, he had them developed, but doesn't have any more copies? Bullshit. Developed means you have an actual picture, so unless he made a hard picture, copies a digitized image to his Flickr account, then destroyed said picture he will have copies. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.