Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 ANALYSIS 
16

Unemployment Will Probably Miss 10%: Silver

Share

(Newser) – Lots of economists are predicting that unemployment, which at last count hung at 9.4%, will hit 10% before the calendar changes, but Nate Silver of FiveThirtyEight.com disagrees. For that to happen, the economy would need to lose another million jobs or so, and "the jobs picture is steadily brightening." Unfortunately, the math becomes complicated if the workforce expands.

Unemployment didn’t fall last month because the economy added jobs. It actually lost jobs, but the workforce decreased even more, as people stopped looking for work, or found alternatives like going back to school, retiring, or even enlisting. As the economy improves, they’ll return. Silver sees unemployment peaking in November at 9.6%, followed by "a steady, and actually fairly robust decline, with about 400,000 jobs being created each month by next summer."

Graphic charts monthly unemployment rate for the past 13 months.
Graphic charts monthly unemployment rate for the past 13 months.
Job seekers are seen 6th Annual Grand Slam Career Fair held at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia, Wednesday, July 15, 2009.
Job seekers are seen 6th Annual Grand Slam Career Fair held at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia, Wednesday, July 15, 2009.   (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
16 comments
VIEWING:
 
Citrixguy
Aug 10, 09 12:00 PM CDT
It only went down to 9.4 because the labor department took 800 000 out of the list, claiming those 800 000 are not looking for work. WIth those factored in, the real unemployment rate is 9.78, The effective unemployment rate is closer to %16, making the total number of people not drawing in a pay check closer to 48 to 49 million Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+5
IN RESPONSE:
Toon
Aug 10, 09 2:25 PM CDT
I agree. The unemployment numbers have been monkeyed with since the 80's. This number is better for comparing various years' numbers but not a good indication of how many are really unemployed.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Robert_Dada
Aug 10, 09 7:48 PM CDT
You might want to thank your wonderful previous president for the conditions that led to this.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
godawgs
Aug 10, 09 12:08 PM CDT
Look, let's hope that this guy is right. 10% unemployment is not good for the country no matter who is in charge. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+10
IN RESPONSE:
Reader65069154
Aug 10, 09 12:11 PM CDT
Of course, lets not forget that Obama told us if the stimulus was passed, we'd not exceed 8%
Vote up! Vote down!
-3
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.