Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


14

Abercrombie Loses Lawsuit Over Clerk's Prosthetic Arm

Share

(Newser) – The London woman banished to the Abercrombie & Fitch stockroom because of her prosthetic arm has been awarded more $13,000 by an employment tribunal, the BBC reports. Riam Dean wore a cardigan to cover the joint between her prosthesis and her body, but the sweater clashed with the retailer’s “look policy.” The tribunal found that policy a violation of employment law, but did not find discrimination.

“The tribunal is satisfied the reason for the claimant's dismissal was her breach of the look policy in wearing a cardigan,” the ruling states. “Whilst the tribunal is satisfied the claimant's dismissal was a consequence of her unlawful harassment, it can not be characterized direct disability discrimination.”

Riam Dean.
Riam Dean.   (AP Photo)
A couple walks into an Abercrombie & Fitch store in San Francisco.
A couple walks into an Abercrombie & Fitch store in San Francisco.   (AP Photo)
Riam Dean.
Riam Dean.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
14 comments
VIEWING:
 
Yourself
Aug 13, 09 3:21 PM CDT
good on her for taking on a shitty company and winning! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+7
Reader64481089
Aug 13, 09 3:23 PM CDT
Yes but it was a win with little teeth and a small victory only in slight compensation. If they would have found discrimination which they should have it would have meant a change in future policy now that isn't so likely Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
IN RESPONSE:
Yourself
Aug 13, 09 6:00 PM CDT
the policy is already in place. the reason they couldn't find/prove without a shadow of a doubt that there was discrimination is cause it was hear-say. they also never actually said it was cause of her arm, they only eluded to it. remember, it has to be proven without a shadow of a doubt.. don't get me wrong, i'm not trying to justify it, i'm just explaining it in my opinion.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Mad
Aug 13, 09 7:14 PM CDT
.... but..... it was NOT discrimination. The policy does not need to be changed, except under the very limited scope of now allowing employees with prosthesis can now cover them
Vote up! Vote down!
0
autorob
Aug 13, 09 3:29 PM CDT
It's up to the public to send a clear message. Don't shop there. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+13
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.