The Music Sucked at Woodstock
By Jason Farago, Newser Staff
Posted Aug 14, 2009 7:06 AM CDT
Concert-goers sit on the roof of a Volkswagen bus at the Woodstock Music and Arts Fair at Bethel, N.Y.    (AP Photo)

(Newser) – Woodstock become an iconic event of the '60s, but according to Wall Street Journal critic Jim Fusilli, it was a mediocre festival at best. Major artists like Lennon, the Doors, and Led Zeppelin stayed away, those who did show were drugged up, and sound equipment failed—the whole thing was "pretty much a bust."

At Woodstock folk music was overrepresented—even though Dylan himself has already gone electric—while black music was largely absent: no James Brown, no Stevie Wonder, no Aretha Franklin. And the Woodstock albums culled the worst bits, inserted new versions of songs, and even relied on actors in a Hollywood studio to augment the cheering. Listen to the full recordings, Fusilli writes, and you'll have to "plow through the dross to enjoy the few moments of musical magic."

View 3 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 21 comments
sdk88
Nov 5, 2015 2:02 AM CST
i just saw the woodstock documentary. the woodstock festival looked absolutely horrible. santana sucked and so did hendrix. so incredibly overrated. glad i didn't live at that time and get dragged into going to it.
JimW
Aug 15, 2009 8:44 AM CDT
Ah yes, those P90's did smoke, did they not ? ;-)
cognitivefilter
Aug 15, 2009 5:23 AM CDT
half of why woodstock was so great was the community and counterculture that so quickly evolved. and, hendrix is a black man who played woodstock. and, jefferson airplane rules.