Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
4

At 50, Kind of Blue Still Totally Awesome

Share

(Newser) – In 1959, Miles Davis was looking to forge a path away from the bebop spearheaded by mentor Charlie Parker, Fred Kaplan writes on Slate. “Parker not only invented bebop, he perfected it,” Kaplan continues, leaving Davis nowhere else to go. So when Davis was introduced to so-called “modal” jazz—with the emphasis on free experimentation with scales and away from rigid chord structures—he jumped at it. “Man, if Bird was alive, this would kill him,” Davis said.

Before he recorded “the best-selling jazz album of all time and the spearhead of an artistic revolution,” Davis needed a pianist “who knew how to accompany without playing chords.” Which was crazy, Kaplan writes, because playing chords “was what modern jazz pianists did.” But with Bill Evans and hornsmen John Coltrane and Cannonball Adderley, a legend was born. The tunes have “the same feel as the other blues tunes,” Kaplan concludes, but “there are no chord changes. It sounds (hence the album’s title) kind of blue.”

Saxophonist John Coltrane played on
Saxophonist John Coltrane played on "Kind of Blue."   (AP Photo)
Miles Davis in 1964.
Miles Davis in 1964.   (AP Photo)
In this image released by Columbia/Legacy, Miles Davis'
In this image released by Columbia/Legacy, Miles Davis' "Kind Of Blue: 50th Anniversary Collector's Edition," is shown.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The album's legacy is mixed, precisely for this reason. It opened up a whole new path of freedom to jazz musicians: Those who had something to say thrived; those who didn't, noodled. That's the dark side of what Miles Davis wrought. - Fred Kaplan

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
4 comments
VIEWING:
 
jbcorny
Aug 17, 09 4:04 PM CDT
one of my favorite albums. was inspired by the story to fire it up on itunes and have another listen. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Bambi
Aug 17, 09 4:46 PM CDT
This was the first jazz album I stumbled onto as a teenager, but it was unfortunate, because it's been a fairly downhill exploration ever since. However, the ceaseless accolades for this album are becoming nauseating, though I disagree with none of them. This act of avant garde has become conventionalized now through 'official' commendation, and that is not the portal of discovery that puts it in the best perspective. I am only glad that I was able to discover it naively, unaware of any hype around it. (Years ago, I found a ring-worn mono LP in a record store for $2.99. I liked the cover and the title, so I decided to try it out.) Let's not cast too many medals at the brilliant moment it preserves. We are meant to move on and stop treating this great achievement in planned spontaneity as though it is cast in stone. That's not what art is for. Miles himself never looked back. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
SPH
Aug 17, 09 7:11 PM CDT
Steely Dan?.... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
cognitivefilter
Aug 18, 09 12:26 AM CDT
AGREE, AGREE, i miss good jazz Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.