Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
8

Lily Allen Rode Piracy to Fame, But Now It's Not OK?

Singer ripped others' music for own mixes before she was a star

Share

(Newser) – Singer Lily Allen has caused a stir with recent rants against music piracy (and a blog where she posts opinions from like-minded creative pals), but when she was trying to make it, she was guilty of just that offense. Allen included tracks from Jay-Z, Jefferson Airplane and others on mixtapes (still available, by the way) with her own songs, Michael Masnick notes in a Techdirt post "from the put-the-stone-down-lily,-that's-a-big-glass-house dept."

“If you’re downloading all your music for free, some real music fan somewhere is paying for your music,” Allen wrote today. “Unfortunately there aren’t enough people paying, which is threatening new music.” A pot-kettle situation indeed, Masnick says, particularly given how the industry has gone after so-called pirates. And, he wonders, “How could someone who is still directly distributing free music from others from her own major-label site claim a moral high ground against music being free?”

Singer Lily Allen poses for photographs at a London event Sept. 8, 2009.
Singer Lily Allen poses for photographs at a London event Sept. 8, 2009.   (AP Photo)
Lily Allen performs in Chelmsford, England, Aug. 22, 2009.
Lily Allen performs in Chelmsford, England, Aug. 22, 2009.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

Honestly, this whole thing is so insane, I'm beginning to wonder if the blog and the statements from Lily Allen are really from her. - Michael Masnick

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
8 comments
VIEWING:
 
Wills
Sep 23, 09 10:59 PM CDT
I thought this was just your standard musician hypocrisy at first, but this is what really strikes me "She claims that people who make music available illegally should have their internet connections removed. Yet, these two mixtapes, hosted directly on her own (EMI copyrighted) website, seem to suggest a pretty massive illegal distribution attempt". It's so plain and clear. There are interesting arguments about mix tapes and piracy, or about people like Girl Talk who use others music to make their own, but if you say people who share files illegally should lose internet access and you share files illegally, I see a problem. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
wwwonderer
Sep 25, 09 12:02 PM CDT
Before jumping to conclusions, on e has to wonder has she LICENSED any of the music she has allegedly stolen. She put whatever she want son a release as long as she has worked out arrangements with the license holder(s). Think of (cheesy) compilations like "That's What I Call Hits XXIX", or your typical Ronco, or K-Tel, or whatever compilations. NONE of those labels makes a single song; they simply license what they want. It's one of the cheapest ways to run a label: sell already-made, already-hit-proven music.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
youngblood
Sep 23, 09 11:06 PM CDT
Busted! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
Cegorach
Sep 24, 09 12:16 AM CDT
Dear Kettle, I feel I must make a comment regarding your current hue -- Pot Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+7
Collusive
Sep 24, 09 12:17 AM CDT
Anyone who goes into the business to make money isn't going to be making good songs in the first place. Also, bands will just have to start playing more shows and selling their music for cheaper online without major distribution. Record labels are the main assassins of the music business because digital technology has the capacity to make them obsolete. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.