Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

McChrystal Should 'Shut Up'

General's job is to advise the president, not lobby publicly for policy changes

By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 5, 2009 4:27 PM CDT

(Newser) – The decisions President Obama will make following his review of Afghanistan policy will be some of the most important of his presidency. The last thing he needs, then, is a rogue general waging a public campaign for the adoption of his preferred strategy. To be sure, Stanley McChrystal deserves enormous respect—but he needs to “shut up and salute,” writes Eugene Robinson.

It’s McChrystal’s job to determine his favored course of action—in this case, a huge troop surge—and present that to the president. But it’s Obama’s job to consider other points of view before making a decision, and McChystal’s public comments complicate that job, Robinson writes for the Washington Post. Ultimately, our goals in Afghanistan are political, and the means to achieve them military. That means the authority rests solely with Obama, and McChystal’s public comments should be limited to “Yes, Mr. President.”

This photo provided by the White House shows President Barack Obama meeting with Gen. Stanley McChrystal, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark.
This photo provided by the White House shows President Barack Obama meeting with Gen. Stanley McChrystal, Friday, Oct. 2, 2009, aboard Air Force One in Copenhagen, Denmark.   (AP Photo/White House, Pete Souza)
Lt. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, President Barack Obama's nominee to be commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 2, 2009.
Lt. Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, President Barack Obama's nominee to be commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, June 2, 2009.   (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

If military officers want to devise and implement geopolitical strategy, they should leave their jobs and run for office.
- Eugene Robinson

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 37 comments
Fondue
Oct 6, 2009 12:19 PM CDT
@godawgs, all I'll say is: let's wait and see. Defeat doesn't mean lost lives. That is going to happen regardless of victory or defeat. But when we come home (and we will some day) and if that nation goes down, conservatives will cheer. If my statement is one of the worst, then must have agreed with Buh on a lot of things. Have you read any of Elmira_NY's comments?
SilenceDogood
Oct 6, 2009 12:05 PM CDT
well said.
Robert_Dada
Oct 6, 2009 12:05 PM CDT
my-name-here: While I respect Bush Sr's service to the country, I don't think being a WW II pilot necessarily qualifies you to be a future commander in chief.

More Newser Stories

Report: Obama Will Send 34K Troops to Afghanistan

Obama to Pull 10K Troops From Afghanistan

Obama Weighs Quicker Afghanistan Pullout

White House Torn Apart By Afghan War

McChrystal's Potty Mouth May Have Cost Him His Job


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne