Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Nothing Wrong With Czars, Experts Testify

But GOP's Collins vows to keep the 'issue' alive with more hearings

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 7, 2009 7:41 AM CDT

(Newser) – The anti-czar crusade hit quite the speed bump yesterday, when five constitutional scholars testified in a Senate hearing that it was indeed perfectly legal for the president to have policy advisers. They said the principle dated back to FDR and that, assuming the czars didn’t have any actual legal authority, there wasn’t an issue. “Practical authority is not legal authority,” noted one scholar.

But Republicans weren’t going to be so easily deterred. Susan Collins vowed to keep the issue alive with another hearing in the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. “The appointments of so many czars have muddied the waters,” she argued, “risking miscommunication going forward.” The experts say Congress has little authority over the czars, who are ultimately members of the president’s personal staff.

President-elect Barack Obama listens as Carol Browner his newly designated White House energy czar speaks at a news conference in Chicago, Monday, Dec. 15, 2008.
President-elect Barack Obama listens as Carol Browner his newly designated White House energy czar speaks at a news conference in Chicago, Monday, Dec. 15, 2008.   (AP Photo)
Susan Collins and Joseph Lieberman are seen on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, Sept. 22,2009, prior to the start of a hearing on the Weapons of Mass Destruction Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2009.
Susan Collins and Joseph Lieberman are seen on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, Sept. 22,2009, prior to the start of a hearing on the Weapons of Mass Destruction Prevention and Preparedness Act of 2009.   (AP Photo/Harry Hamburg)
Robert Byrd, seen in this July 17, 2008 file photo, has objected to Obama's use of czars.
Robert Byrd, seen in this July 17, 2008 file photo, has objected to Obama's use of czars.   (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
Former 'Green Jobs Czar' Van Jones is seen in this June 16, 2009 file photo.
Former 'Green Jobs Czar' Van Jones is seen in this June 16, 2009 file photo.   (AP Photo/Carlos Osorio)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 18 comments
Snarfeh
Oct 10, 2009 2:24 AM CDT
@dawgs - I appreciate the sentiments on my situation and for the record, I didn't say it for that, but only to make a point of the needs right here in our country. But no one cared that people were being needlessly killed by Saddam prior to Busch. The only people who gave a damn what he was doing to his people were the way left liberals. We didn't invade Iraq to save those people. We invaded Iraq for several reasons and all were bad. Oil, Busch's revenge, war profiteering, etc. If you mean the people who died after the invasion, well, they would not have died if we had not invaded. And losing money sucks, no matter what country is draining it from us. If it's being used and used well, I can deal with that. But when it's going down a hole into the pockets of people who are essentially stealing it, I have a problem with that. The war, in conjunction with some of the financial decisions regarding our economy, has drained us. If we'd never gone, things might not be as bad here now. How can we be a bastion to other countries when we are not even a bastion to our own? Also, we might have been in a better position to help now if we had not invaded, but I reiterate that prior to the invasion, no one cared about what Saddam was doing to his people but Amnesty Int'l. and the like...
godawgs
Oct 8, 2009 5:21 AM CDT
@snar first off let me say that I feel for job situation I do, but there were people over there getting killed just because. If we lost so much money in Iraq and you don't think that it is our place to help other countries then why no protests over the money that goes to Africa, Mexico, or any other host of third world countries? It is America's place to be a bastion of hope and if there is oppression then we have historically came to the rescue. Now did we go into Iraq initially for the wrong reasons? yes, but our side affects have greatly improved what was a shithole for people to live in.
godawgs
Oct 8, 2009 5:17 AM CDT
you forgot the link...

More Newser Stories

Eastwood: I'm Not Politically Affiliated With Obama

Obama Takes Flak Over Keystone Rejection

Obama Losing Super PAC War

Obama Wants Power to Merge 6 Trade Agencies

Under Obama, a Force of Killer Drones Evolved


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne