Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Anthropologist: Modern Male Is 'Worst' Man Ever

We're not as robust, Aussie argues in new book

By Mary Papenfuss,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 14, 2009 5:00 AM CDT

(Newser) – California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is such a girly man by Neanderthal standards that some caveman's wife could have kicked his ass in arm wrestling, an Australian anthropologist argues in his new book. In fact, Peter McAllister calls modern males the "worst" men in history, at least when it comes to physical prowess. Australian Aboriginals were faster,  Neanderthals were stronger and Roman legions could run at least a marathon a day, he argues.

"These people were much more robust," says McAllister, who has written Manthropology: The Science of the Inadequate Modern Male. Clearly, though, they weren't as handsome by modern-day female standards, and "we wouldn't want to go back to the brutality of those days," McAllister concedes.

This picture provided by the American Museum of Natural History shows a mural depicting Neanderthal life.
This picture provided by the American Museum of Natural History shows a mural depicting Neanderthal life.   (AP Photo/American Museum of Natural History)
What an ape.
What an ape.   (©hairymuseummatt)
Not much to look at, though.
Not much to look at, though.   (©erix!)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 35 comments
yummines
Oct 15, 2009 12:48 PM CDT
Well humans survived because they were smarter, not stronger. If everything depended on strength in the world, as if there were no weapons or tools, then humans would be screwed. Luckily humans have a high iq and aposable (correct me if i spelled it wrong) thumbs so we are the top of pretty much any living thing.
Fiskebolle
Oct 15, 2009 5:49 AM CDT
If neanderthals were alive today, they'd be considered a different race rather than a different species. And race doesn't exist. Ergo, neanderthals didn't exist. Flawless doubleplusgood logic.
Rocket448
Oct 15, 2009 2:46 AM CDT
Neanderthals are cousins of ours, ok. So, in comparison to earlier members of sapiens, is a modern male as robust as he once was? I for one have no doubt he's not. Our species has been culled in reverse by wars in which the best - the very best men on two legs - were killed on fields, in trenches, and in the forests. For example, an entire generation of young adult European men was actually, truly, lost to our species in the trenches of the first world war. On all the continents, wars of conquest rebellion and colonization ended family lines, allowing less robust males to mate. I am not pushing a political point or trying to sensationalize this issue, I'm just trying to make a reasonable case for a decline in our specie's general fitness.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne