Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 OPINION 
9

Bush AG: Court Terror Trials Too Dangerous

Challenges to security, secrecy would be 'overwhelming'

Share

(Newser) – The Obama administration wants to try alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other Guantanamo detainees in federal courts—and that's a major mistake, says Michael Mukasey. Terrorism trials pose "overwhelming" security challenges, and classified information would have to be revealed, warns George Bush's relatively moderate third attorney general in a Wall Street Journal op ed. "The Justice Department claims that our courts are well suited to the task," he writes. "Based on my experience, they aren't."

Mukasey has particular experience with terror cases in civilian courts. In 1995, he presided over the prosecution of Omar Abdel Rahman for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. That trial, just like the trials for al-Qaeda's African embassy bombings, did nothing to prevent 9/11. For Mukasey, the insistence that closing Gitmo will bring instant goodwill rings pretty hollow. "In a war on terror—to use an unfashionably harsh phrase—courts should have, as the term 'war' would suggest, a supporting and not a principal role," he writes.

In this March 27, 2008 picture, former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey addresses the Commonwealth Club San Francisco.
In this March 27, 2008 picture, former U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey addresses the Commonwealth Club San Francisco.   (AP Photo/Noah Berger, File)
Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey addresses the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Law and National Security, at the University Club in Washington.
Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey addresses the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on Law and National Security, at the University Club in Washington.   (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The rules for conducting criminal trials in federal courts have been fashioned to prosecute conventional crimes by conventional criminals. That can provide a cornucopia of valuable information to terrorists. - Michael Mukasey

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
9 comments
VIEWING:
 
polstroad
Oct 19, 09 5:39 AM CDT
TYhat the earlier trial did nothing to prevent 9/11 is hardly a reason to stop court trials in favor or "secret trials." The failure seems due to various intel outfits (NSA, CIA, FBI) fighting turf wars rather than cooperating, and an administration (Bush/GOP) that ignored warnings it had received. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+6
IN RESPONSE:
So_Cal_Larry
Oct 20, 09 2:09 AM CDT
Through President Clinton, these matters were considered legal matters. Starting with President Bush, these matters became war matters. When they were legal matters, the various department of the government were not talking to each other (they didn't trust each other - ain't that a hoot?). So information in the CIA did not go the the FBI. Raw data in the NSA was not going to the FBI for analysis and action. These were all bureaucrats fighting for turf. Damn the American people.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
d3wd
Oct 20, 09 2:28 PM CDT
Notice that Obama is doing nothing to undo the injustices of the Bush administration.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
SilenceDogood
Oct 19, 09 6:16 AM CDT
Fighting a reclusive, entrenched terrorist enemy within our own boarders; with our hands tied behind our back; while the Justice department is hunting for GWB era bad guys; with an underfunded agency budget is ludicrous. Obama says the War on Terror is over, I think it has just begun. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
KennyBoy
Oct 19, 09 10:59 AM CDT
Are you against skate boarders or snow boarders? And how are they our enemy?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.