Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 JEFFREY SACHS 
33

Coal Harms the Planet —and Owns the Senate

Blame industry as well as ideology if US shirks Copenhagen

Share

(Newser) – As the world turns to Copenhagen this December, the US, which never ratified the Kyoto Protocol, may once again fail to sign up to save the world from serious climate change. Ideology plays a part, Jeffrey Sachs notes, as many Republican senators are "intent on derailing any Obama initiative." But the bigger problem is economic: No fewer than 25 states produce coal, and the odds of winning even Democratic senators' votes from those states are daunting.

President Obama is negotiating with coal-state senators, and he has the power to order the EPA to impose limits on coal plants and automakers. But the near-impossibility of scoring 67 votes in the Senate raises the real prospect of the US "irresponsibly" shirking environmental progress when even China and India are coming around. "Even coal-state senators should be ashamed," Sachs writes.

Farmer Dave Eckhardt inspecting an onion crop on his farm near La Salle, Colo.
Farmer Dave Eckhardt inspecting an onion crop on his farm near La Salle, Colo.   (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski)
Greenpeace protesters occupy the lower balcony of the right chimney of the Patnow power plant near Konin, central Poland, Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2008.
Greenpeace protesters occupy the lower balcony of the right chimney of the Patnow power plant near Konin, central Poland, Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2008.   (AP Photo/Alik Keplicz)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

It is the world's largest and most powerful country, and the one most responsible for climate change to this point; it has behaved without any sense of duty—to its own citizens, to the world and to future generations. - Jeffrey Sachs

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
33 comments
VIEWING:
 
DJM420
Oct 21, 09 8:41 AM CDT
surprise! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
George_Taylor
Oct 21, 09 8:47 AM CDT
There are people dumb enough to buy electric cars in coal-powered cities. I'm unsure how big of a difference in emissions it is, but it's not much better. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-1
IN RESPONSE:
tomodachi
Oct 21, 09 9:16 AM CDT
Not true... Electric is tremendously better than gas powered. 1. It's much cleaner because there are fewer emissions even if sourced by coal (google: electric car versus ICE coal). 2. Electric can be supplied from renewable sources: solar, wind, hydro.. etc., which makes it even greener. 3. Electric supply creates US jobs (as opposed to buying middle east oil) and shipping our money to foreign countries. 4. Electric cars help eliminate the need for middle east oil... not only does the US become more self sufficient, but we won't have to rely on people who hate us for our energy needs. I could go on and on. Electric cars are much better than ICE cars.
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
George_Taylor
Oct 21, 09 9:22 AM CDT
Thanks for the tip. I would love to have electric cars (or air or hydrogen) but I figure we ought to cut back as much as we can for the fight now. I'll bike until my city switches (it's gonna be a long wait).
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
George_Taylor
Oct 21, 09 9:23 AM CDT
[my computer is running on 3500 potatoes]
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.