Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


 NICHOLAS KRISTOF 
13

More Troops in Afghanistan = Angrier Insurgents

Doesn't US remember how our country began? Or how Vietnam ended?

Share

(Newser) – The United States was born from a nationalist insurgency. “Given that history, you’d think we might be more sensitive to nationalism abroad,” writes Nicholas Kristof. “Yet the most systematic foreign-policy mistake we Americans have made in the post-World War II period has been to underestimate its potency.” It was true in Vietnam, in Latin America—and now in Afghanistan.

The Pashtun insurgency doesn’t appear to have responded favorably to the 21,000 troops we added earlier this year, Kristof writes in the New York Times. “It’s difficult to see why 40,000 more would help either.” There’s often a backlash when Pakistani troops meddle in Pashtun areas. “If Pashtuns react that way to Punjabis, why do we think they will react better to Texans?” The $10 billion to $40 billion a year needed for the surge could be better spent at home, Kristof writes—and not on spilling more American blood while “inflaming Pashtun nationalism.”

Soldiers from the US Army's 118th Military Police Co., based at Fort Bragg, NC, take up positions at their combat outpost in the Jalrez Valley in Afghanistan's Wardak Province.
Soldiers from the US Army's 118th Military Police Co., based at Fort Bragg, NC, take up positions at their combat outpost in the Jalrez Valley in Afghanistan's Wardak Province.   (AP Photo)
Pakistani police officers.
Pakistani police officers.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

My suggestion is that we scale back our aims, for Afghanistan is not going to be a shining democracy any time soon. We should keep our existing troops to protect the cities (but not the countryside). - Nicholas Kristof

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
13 comments
VIEWING:
 
bewilderbeast
Oct 22, 09 10:02 AM CDT
Hear that whooshing sound? Actually, you won't - YET. Your children will hear it. It's the sound of chickens coming home to roost. You're at that Top-of-the-Tree stage of Empire where you believe that the only effects you have to care about are the repercussions at home ("what will the voters think?"). Your children will find out that what the OTHER 6200million people in the world thought of your warring escapades actually WAS important. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
alkaseltzersammich
Oct 22, 09 10:20 AM CDT
I'm over this whole war thing. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
ultramarine13
Oct 22, 09 10:32 AM CDT
I can't decide which way to go on this. On the one hand, more troops could definitely add security to Afghanistan and the surrounding areas. On the other hand, it could anger insurgents and make a bad situation worse. I'm glad Obama is taking his time on this one, and also that I'm not in his position. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Doctor_Zaius
Oct 22, 09 11:00 AM CDT
It's a lot easier messing things up (Bush) than it is fixing them (Obama)
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
Snowleopard
Oct 22, 09 11:51 AM CDT
I'm glad they're redoing the election, cause there's certainly no reason to send U.S. troops to go die for a corrupt, illegitimate leader there
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.