Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter


19

Iran Wants to Change Uranium Deal

But Tehran proposal would make the agreement pointless

Share

(Newser) – Iran continues to waffle on the details of the deal under consideration to ship its enriched uranium to Russia. Now it's saying that if it does agree to the deal—a formal response is due Friday—it won't send all of its uranium at once. Instead, it will send shipments to Russia in installments, a condition that would make the agreement largely pointless.

"One of the problems would be that a part of the stockpile would remain in Iran, so the risk of breakout capacity would still be there," one researcher tells the New York Times. Other analysts suggest that Tehran's latest declaration may simply be a trial balloon to see how the West reacts.

Head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, center, makes his way as he arrives at the Imam Khomeini airport south of the capital Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Oct. 3, 2009.
Head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohamed ElBaradei, center, makes his way as he arrives at the Imam Khomeini airport south of the capital Tehran, Iran, Saturday, Oct. 3, 2009.   (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)
Manouchehr Mottaki, Iran's minister for Foreign Affairs.
Manouchehr Mottaki, Iran's minister for Foreign Affairs.   (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, file)
This satellite image taken Saturday Sept. 26, 2009, provided by GeoEye shows a facility under construction inside a mountain located about 20 miles north northeast of Qom, Iran.
This satellite image taken Saturday Sept. 26, 2009, provided by GeoEye shows a facility under construction inside a mountain located about 20 miles north northeast of Qom, Iran.   (AP Photo/GeoEye Satellite Image, IHS Jane's Analysis)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
19 comments
VIEWING:
 
Jayster999
Oct 27, 09 5:30 PM CDT
Iran is pointless. Let's nuke them. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-6
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Oct 27, 09 6:09 PM CDT
As I mentioned in an earlier discussion, the Right always seems to go for genocide paid for by taxpayers.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
RobN
Oct 27, 09 6:35 PM CDT
Jayster does not speak for the right; he speaks for jackasses, and jackassness crosses party lines.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
IN RESPONSE:
Yourself
Oct 27, 09 6:40 PM CDT
yeah, cause nuclear war is exactly what we need now right? idiot...
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Fondue
Oct 27, 09 7:10 PM CDT
RobN, is that what I said, or are you extrapolating? Jayster's comment is certainly a common response from the right, and not as common on the left.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.