Loose FBI Rules Raise Privacy Fears

makes sense what the lawyer is saying. getting the lead on a "suspicious person" should not start with religion, race, or even sexual orientation. they should be "suspicious" by acting suspicious, and race and religion should have nothing to do with it. Reply

Please, If there is a sole out there who can read anything--the CIA opened your mail all through the sixties. The FBI was so into the the radical groups of the sixties that they couldn't prosecute Ayers because an FBI plant gave him the fricking explosives. Your security system has been up your butt forever--don't you dare believe that they're just starting now. Want to understand your FBI--google the Black Panthers and Jean Seaberg. That is just the tiniest tip of what the FBI has been doing forever. After JFK died, Truman wrote an op-ed in the Times and tried to explain why he invented the CIA--you'd think a happy Democracy wouldn't need one--he said I just wanted a consolidated daily briefing. Central Intelligence--consolidated--he had no idea that they would rule the world-or run the poppy trade in Afganhistan--it costs more money in chemical products to turn a poppy seed into opium than the GNP of the whole country, yet, they ship OPIUM not seeds to Iran, Pakistan and Russia. Don't you find that in the least bit odd? Or, have you lost the ability to see a tree in the forest that has become our lives? Reply

Muslim attacked and killed 150 persons in Nigeria in February 2009. A Muslim mob attacked a Jewish center at Toronto University in February 2009. Muslims attacked a church and looted Christian homes in Egypt in June 2009. A Muslim mob attacked Pakistani Christians in September 2009. Muslim terrorists murdered more than 100 women and children with a car bomb in Pakistan in October 2009. Most important, 19 Muslims murdered more innocent persons on September 11 than the number of American criminals executed since 1945. Thus, the FBI lacks any justifiable reason to regard Muslims as potential sources of violence—persons who pose no greater threat to the nation's security than residents living in retirement homes. Reply