Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Stupak Is the Last Straw—No More Caving!

Women should not 'take one for the team' on abortion coverage

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Nov 16, 2009 11:12 AM CST

(Newser) – Painting the Stupak-Pitts amendment as a necessary evil—a concession women should make for the “greater good” of health care reform—is ridiculous, Katha Pollitt writes. Women have been consistently sidelined by the “theocrats and male chauvinists” throwing their weight around in the Democratic Party. “Why don't you take one for the team for a change and see how you like it?” she says, suggesting that instead of women caving on abortion coverage, maybe men could cave on, say, coverage for Viagra or prostate cancer.

Even President Obama is no help, Pollitt writes in the Nation, spouting platitudes like “‘this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill.’ Abortion is health care. That's the whole point.” And the fact that tax-exempt religious organizations are engineering what American taxpayers will or won’t pay for is not lost on Pollitt, who doesn’t like supporting their "misogynist fairy tales and sour-old-man hierarchies.” Pro-choicers are fed up with taking hits for the team, she says, and without them there’s not “much of a team” at all.

Abortion rights activists
Abortion rights activists   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

You know what I don't want to hear right now about the Stupak-Pitts amendment banning abortion coverage from federally subsidized health insurance policies? That it's the price of reform, and prochoice women should shut up. - Katha Pollitt

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 24 comments
Face-Of-RNC
Nov 17, 2009 12:02 PM CST
The bill provided no money for abortion before the stupak ammendment. You're arguing about something on which you don't have the facts. Stupak's goes further and prevents the purchase of insurance from any company that provides abortion coverage even to those who pay soley from private funds. This is religion taking over government.
Face-Of-RNC
Nov 17, 2009 11:57 AM CST
dly - If taking money from the government is wrong, then your first argument is with corporations and corporate welfare. The trillions stolen from taxpayers by corporations overshadows anything provided to individuals. As for early term abortion, the supreme court has spoken, women have a right to it legally. None of your rants or opinions matter.
WallyEFunk
Nov 17, 2009 6:22 AM CST
Not the way I like it.But do you really prefer to have un- wanted children, born,because they can't afford an abortion, to be sold for drug money and later find there little bodies on the side of the road as garbage. All those against abortion, let PPL know here, how many kids you have adopted.

More Newser Stories

Obama Delays Asia Trip to Firm Up Health Reform

White House Telling Me to Zip It: Stupak

GOP: Congress, Prez Must Go On Public Option

Zip It on Communion Ban: Bishop to Kennedy

Abortion Activists Mobilize Against Stupak-Pitts


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne