Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters


12

Govt. Panel Recommends Fewer Mammograms

Breast cancer screenings should start at 50, not 40: task force

Share

(Newser) – Most women can wait to get their first mammogram at 50 and then should get one every 2 years rather than annually, a powerful health policy group said today. New information led to the recommendations, said a member of the influential task force that reversed a 7-year-old edict urging aggressive screening for breast cancer starting at age 40. The extra screenings did not have a strong enough effect in reducing cancer to outweigh the detrimental effects of the screenings themselves, the task force found.

Those risks include extreme anxiety and unnecessary treatment. Insurance companies and Medicare are expected to reduce coverage of screenings in line with the new recommendation, which does not apply to women with recognized risk factors, the New York Times reports. But a statistician involved with the task force stressed that it was not an economic decision: “The money was buying something of net negative value. The economy benefits, but women are the major beneficiaries.”

An influential breast cancer group issued new guidelines on how oftenw omen should get mammograms.
An influential breast cancer group issued new guidelines on how oftenw omen should get mammograms.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
12 comments
VIEWING:
 
RobN
Nov 16, 09 5:46 PM CST
Risks from mammograms include extreme anxiety? I'd just as soon suffer through the anxiety and catch the cancer early, thank you very much. I'll trade a few sleepless nights for not being dead because I waited too long. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
doingtherightthing
Nov 16, 09 6:04 PM CST
Obamacare less expensive medical care for older women coming......The government never gets human health care right.........hey where's my shot oops, no vaccine......
Vote up! Vote down!
-2
IN RESPONSE:
DontLikeYou
Nov 16, 09 7:22 PM CST
.... and if this healthcare monstrosity passes.... fewer chest xrays, fewer doctors visits, fewer chances to see a real doctor (see a nurse instead).... ah liberals, you people are such naive fools.
Vote up! Vote down!
-3
IN RESPONSE:
OG_Travis
Nov 16, 09 8:59 PM CST
i actually thumbed up something you said ruber!
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
deebles
Nov 16, 09 11:01 PM CST
You got a history in your family? I'm 53 and just had my fourteenth mammogram which said the same thing as all the others and I take no hormones and they charged my insurance 23 hundred bucks so, I'm done. I get more radiation from the test which makes my company so much more money than the need for the test. I think that this article to forty year old women is huge. Read the shampoo bottle where it says wash, rinse and wash again--a genius ad man. Yearly mammograms for women with no family history of breast cancer at forty on--is wash, rinse and wash again. I get the rads and they get the money. Breast cancer in women with no history is caused by supplemental estrogen. Women who take supplemental estrogen for ten years to have collagen in their face and an elastic vagina after menopause are like smokers. Until, we stop treating breast cancer like some badge of courage--women won't stop with the garbage.
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 

from our news partners

Please wait, content is loading
Please wait, content is loading

Just For Laughs

Loading...