Amanda Knox Trial: the Unanswered Questions
Verdict leaves troubling issues, from lack of motive to weak evidence
By Caroline Miller,  Newser Staff
Posted Dec 5, 2009 7:30 AM CST
This photo released by Italian Police shows 22-year-old British student Meredith Kercher, found dead in the apartment she shared with American Amanda Knox, in Perugia, where they were both studying.   (AP Photo/Police, h.o.)
camera-icon View 3 more images

(Newser) – The verdict was swift, but the 11-month-long trial of Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, convicted of murdering British student Meredith Kercher, failed to answer these nagging questions, the Telegraph reports:

  • What was the motive? Prosecutors said it was a four-way sex game, but the perpetrators barely knew each other. The notion of virtual strangers getting together for a brutal slaying still strains credulity.

  • What about the 'she-devil' theory? After the orgy-gone wrong theory, prosecutors charged that Knox murdered Kercher in rage over criticism that she was a bad flat-mate. Does that really stack up against the alternative—that Rudy Guede, drug dealer and suspected thief, raped and murdered Kercher on his own?
  • Wasn't the DNA evidence sketchy? The Sollecito DNA on the bra clasp was tiny, and it was found on the floor, 7 weeks after the murder, leading to a high risk of contamination.
  • Did they have the wrong murder weapon? The knife didn't match the wounds, or a bloody smear on the bedclothes, and Knox's DNA on it could have come from paring an apple. Kercher's DNA was so iffy it wouldn't have been admissible in many courts.
  • Why did Guede change his story? In a cell-phone call when he was on the run, he told a friend that Knox was not in the apartment the night of the murder. It was months after his arrest that he said she and Kercher had argued.

 

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |  
13%
25%
46%
8%
4%
4%