Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Why Knox Got an Extra Year in the Clink

Slate visits some puzzlers from the Knox trial answered

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Dec 8, 2009 10:50 AM CST

(Newser) – The Amanda Knox trial has left a lot of unanswered questions, and some totally answerable ones. Slate’s Explainer feature tackles the latter:

  • Why did Knox get 26 years, while Raffaele Sollecito only got 25? Knox got an extra year for falsely accusing an innocent man (she accused the bar owner early on in the investigation, but later said she did it under duress).

  • Knox’s attorneys said the prosecution’s DNA evidence was contaminated and insufficient. Can DNA really produce a false match? Yes. It’s common for police or lab techs to accidentally transfer a few thousand picograms of DNA between items. The amounts found on the knife were so small that a US crime lab would have thrown out the results.
  • Didn’t they scrub that knife with bleach? How was there any DNA? DNA’s pretty persistent. Even bleach will only remove it if you’re really, really thorough when cleaning.

Amanda Knox arrives for a hearing in Perugia's court, Italy, Monday, Nov. 30, 2009.
Amanda Knox arrives for a hearing in Perugia's court, Italy, Monday, Nov. 30, 2009.   (AP Photo/Stefano Medici)
US murder suspect Amanda Knox during a hearing in the Meredith Kercher murder trial, in Perugia, Italy, Friday, June 26, 2009.
US murder suspect Amanda Knox during a hearing in the Meredith Kercher murder trial, in Perugia, Italy, Friday, June 26, 2009.   (AP Photo/Stefano Medici)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
8%
15%
42%
12%
4%
19%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
weeb35
Dec 9, 2009 11:57 AM CST
It certainly is extremely sad for the victims family... but our history has already proven that innocent people have been accused of crimes and sentence to very long terms..... because the crime was so awefull people's anger blinded them and thus the innocent.... So lets be more responsible and not tie the accused to the victims family... it only blinds us
passinthru
Dec 9, 2009 8:15 AM CST
why not? the rest of the world is.
Kookey90
Dec 9, 2009 7:26 AM CST
I assume the judge wants Amanda to spend a whole year thinking about why she would accuse an innocent man of something he did not commit.

More Newser Stories

Amanda Knox Judge: She Could Have Killed Meredith

In Knox Verdict, a Victory for Reality

Knox Plans Final 'Plea for Her Life'

Amanda Knox Innocent, Verdict 'Absurd': Ex

Italian Courts Face Growing Knox Backlash


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne