Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Guy Buys $123 Safe on eBay, Finds $26,000 Inside Seller tries to get half the cash back, fails »

Obama Needs a Louder Left

Without a strong progressive movement, country won't shift leftward

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 6, 2010 1:20 PM CST

(Newser) – If Barack Obama wants to be a transformational progressive president like Lyndon Johnson or FDR, he’s going to need a strong liberal movement in the streets. “Every Democratic president since Johnson has raised the hope that he would bring with him a new era of progressive reform,” writes Harold Meyerson, but they’ve all suffered from “the absence of a vibrant left movement,” like the communist, democratic socialist, or civil rights movements.

Obama doesn’t have such an autonomous movement, but he does have something none of those presidents had: A list of 13 million supporters. But he’s been afraid to mobilize them, because he’d be “answerable for every loopy tactic” they employed. Which means that unless people like Rachel Maddow or Keith Olbermann can whip up the masses the way Glenn Beck has, and soon, Obama’s presidency will be more Clinton than Roosevelt.

Activists protest outside the Pepsi Center during the 2008 Democratic National Convention August 27, 2008, in Denver, Colorado.
Activists protest outside the Pepsi Center during the 2008 Democratic National Convention August 27, 2008, in Denver, Colorado.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
8%
4%
8%
12%
65%
4%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 39 comments
theobserver
Jan 10, 2010 8:55 AM CST
Corn,..........Hi back to ya.....here is a short cut & paste from: .......... "The Top Ten Myths of American Health Care…..A Citizen’s Guide"…….. http://special.pacificresearch...……….. ...United States lag far behind other advanced nations? Not if one takes a hard look at the statistics. In 2006, U.S. life expectancy reached a record high of 78.1 years. Good news, to be sure. But that record number still put the nation behind almost 30 other countries. In Japan, Hong Kong, Canada, France, Sweden, and elsewhere, people are expected to live well past their 80th birthday. Outcomes do matter. But the United States has nothing to be embarrassed about. Crude indicators like life expectancy and infant mortality don’t reflect just reflect the quality of a health care system. They also reflect cultural, behavioral, and other factors, such as a nation’s homicide rate, the number of accidents, diet trends, ethnic diversity, pre-natal habits and much more. It’s not pretty but it affects health care statistics. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, America’s homicide rate was 5.9 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2004.35 In contrast, it was 1.95 in Canada, 1.64 in France, and 0.98 in Germany.36 The United States also has more car accidents. According to the Department of Transportation, America had 14.24 fatalities per 100,000 people from auto accidents in 2006.37 In Canada, the number was 9.25. In France, 7.4. In Germany, despite the country’s high-speed autobahns, fatalities stood at just 6.19 per 100,000.38 ............................
Kip
Jan 10, 2010 7:55 AM CST
BOTHPARTIESSUCK: I've seen Beck and Faux News and they ARE indeed hate mongers. Any idiot can see that. MSNBC in not shown in my country, so I wouldn't know what they do.
Hip
Jan 7, 2010 12:54 PM CST
@cher, "cedarkey" is "USAHomeofthebrave".

More Newser Stories

How Would Cool Hand Obama Govern?

Obama 15th-Best President, Scholars Say

A History of Political Cussing

Left: Obama Finally Steps Up

All Living Presidents Will Attend Kennedy's Funeral


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne